3
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,896 Given: 852 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,069 Given: 713 |
You forgot these:
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,069 Given: 713 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,356 Given: 7,733 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,666 Given: 13,081 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,243 Given: 2,623 |
Yeah In this philosophy everybody is Gracile-Med. There are even no Alpines because they are fat Gracile-Meds Only Cromags and Baltids maybe, are supposed to be distinct
Absurd simplicity.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,075 Given: 1,717 |
You've included people that widely vary from a genetic/ancestry standpoint into the same phenotype, along with extremely different environment/climate conditions, both modern and historic.
While going by measurements all of this may be correct, it serves no practical purpose in the real, modern world, rendering this type of physical anthropology useless, especially since this broad "Mediterrannean" phenotype will likely not have all its members correlate with much, if any social circumstances or attributes.
To summarize, the first 4 panels and the "Nordic Med", "Pure Med" picture are a different phenotype than the rest of the panels/pictures, and pseudo internet anthropology is a better system.
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.oldschool anthropologydivided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpine
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks