0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
Do anyone know what affiliation the La Brana individuals had in previous analysis done by others except for the official research paper?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
Not a project update but a pilot study confirming everything is alright with the La Brańa individuals genotypes extracted.
http://fennoscandia.blogspot.no/2013...-european.html
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
I have now done a first initial test run with a few especially Northern European populations consisting of both reference panels and project participants. I cant find the connection Vadim Verenich claimed to have found between the La Brána and the Saami or at least not to that extend he seem to have found it. As I understand the found connection was as large as 80%.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 144 Given: 23 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,954 Given: 11,022 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
Difficult to say. I will not claim at Vadim's wrong. In the Chromopainter-Finestructure with a very small dataset of North-Europeans individuals the BRA composite individual appears to show the strongest affiliation first with the Lithuanians and secondary with some Finns. The affiliation to the Saami appears more distant. However the Lithuanians had affiliations with other populations the BRA individuals didn't have in that run. On the other han I just run a K2-K7 run with 63k in ADMIXTURE. At K7 the BRA clustered with what appear to be a North-East Europe component that peaks in Finns and Saamis and to less extent among Scandinavians and showed no affiliation with Lithuanians who peaked in a Eastern European cluster that goes all the way to the Chuvash.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
I think Vadim is into something, look at this one This is a local Euro analysis. X-asis is dimension 1 and Y-axis dimension 2.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks