0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 334 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,896 Given: 852 |
OP, if you read Coon's book, he says exactly that. His thesis is that Dinaricization is a process which occurs separately in different populations, among different groups of Mediterranean-Alpine blends. "Dinaric" populations will have some individuals which clearly show the Dinaric features and others which are mostly Alpine-Med and don't show them to a strong degree, as well as purer Meds and Alpines. (And as others have pointed out, those features seem to show more often in men than in women). Based on that observation, he assumed that Dinaricization was related to the blending of dolichocephalic and brachycephalic types, which sometimes developed a distinctive set of facial features due to some unknown mechanism.
It's also been pointed out that there is a relationship between the Dinaric and Borreby types, which blend into each other in the Bell Beaker folk as well as Coon's examples of Balkan UP survivors. Someone (don't remember who) claimed the Borreby skull itself was related to Dinarics.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,997 Given: 6,001 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Farmers. Nutrition with low protein level.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,036 Given: 1,056 |
Absolutely nothing in fossil record proves Caucasian origin of Dinaric type. Caucasians are not predominantly Dinaric (even though it does exist there in sizable quantity):
On the whole, the Dinaricism of the Caucasian area is only partial; there are too many unaltered Mediterraneans, and too many Alpine-Danubian mixtures, which, here as in Croatia and Slovenia, fail to assume a Dinaric facial form, to make the Caucasus as Dinaric a country as the Tyrol or Albania.
(TRoE, chapter XII, section 18)
Origins of Dinaric type lie strongly in Europe.
Montenegro is actually least Dinaric out of all western Balkan countries (even less Dinaric than Tyrol). You can often see Dinaricized individuals, but pure Dinarics are extremely rare.
Montenegro is not, therefore, simply a Dinaric nucleus; it is a Borreby-like or Afalou-like outcropping within a Dinaric nucleus.
(TRoE, chapter XII, section 12)
Nasal convexity is neither a defining trait of Dinaric (explained in earlier posts), nor does nasal form play a significant role in sexual dimorphism.
Also, Dinarics are most commonly of lean build.
It is not a type with strong sexual dimorphism. Dinaric women often look quite masculine.
Borreby type is in no way related to Dinaric. Especially original Borreby skull, with its peculiar dimensions, vertically compressed mental protuberance, rocker jaw, and Neanderthaloid skullcap, can't be tied to Dinaric in any way.
Borreby of present-day western Balkans (core is found in Montenegro, with a few extensions towards neighboring areas), or any UP type for that matter, was not found in ancient Illyrian skeletons (a good example is Glasinac skeletal series), which suggests UP types didn't survive Neolithic and Iron Age on Balkans, but rather had to come from somewhere during Migration Period.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 334 Given: 0 |
"Dinarid" does not exist in the North Caucasus.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,896 Given: 852 |
The view that the Borreby skull was related to Dinarics was actually the common viewpoint of the early authors. Here are just two examples I managed to dig up with a few minutes of searching:
http://www.theapricity.com/earlson/reeh/reoehchap7.htm
https://books.google.com/books?id=VI...page&q&f=false
Note: I don't necessarily agree with that viewpoint, I am just sharing what others have claimed.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,095 Given: 10,128 |
That is what i was saying.
Nasal form is one of the most sexually dimorphic traits. In all studied populations males have higher percent of Straight and convex noses, while females tend towards concavity.
Point being that for 10 dinaric males you can find about 1 dinaric female.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,269 Given: 13,631 |
Shieeeeeeeeeet, some of you actually read this old anthropology crap.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks