0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 31 Given: 39 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,829 Given: 2,653 |
Is cow milk in India pink because of internal bleeding of the cows because of unsanitary conditions and the favourite Indian hobby of shitting in the Ganges river?
Did the British steal all your toilets in India? Why do you shit in the streets?
Do you also shit in the streets of Australia as part of tradition?
Being Greek is an experienced grounded into nation, not consumption.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 31 Given: 39 |
Indian Australians record high levels of educational attainment that surpass the national average. In 2016, it was revealed 54.6% of Indian migrants in Australia hold a Bachelor’s degree or a higher educational degree, three times more than Australia’s national average of 17.2% in 2011, making them the most educated migrant group in Australia.[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Australians
You'd be the one cleaning up the shit after them anyways. Balkan immigrant.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,829 Given: 2,653 |
brother, I am sorry if I offended you. I am just asking innocent questions.
Why are your people in India shitting all across the Ganges river? Could you kindly explain to me why?
I am despondent from your response and I ask you to kindly explain to me why your own people shit in your holiest river!!!
https://www.smh.com.au/national/the-...06-100xz9.html
https://www.theguardian.com/global-d...n-clean-ganges
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ow/5899475.cms
https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/con...ation-problem/
Also, why did you or your family move to Australia?
I ask very kindly.
Is it because your country is a country without toilets where people shit everywhere and Australia has better living conditions or is it another reason?
Is it because of the stench in your country?
Please answer me these important questions
Being Greek is an experienced grounded into nation, not consumption.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,186 Given: 3,169 |
The British were much more just foreign rulers in India than the prior rulers, the Mughals, whom were Persianised Muslim Turko-Mongol rulers.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 31 Given: 39 |
Whoa, let's stop right there. You want me to take your word over a Phd economic historian who studies this subject?
During the Mughal Empire, India was the world leader in manufacturing, producing 25% of the world's industrial output up until the mid-18th century, prior to British rule.[4][5] Due to its ancient history as a trading zone and later its colonial status, colonial India remained economically integrated with the world, with high levels of trade, investment and migration.[6] India experienced deindustrialization under British rule,[4] which along with fast economic and population growth in the Western World resulted in India's share of the world economy declining from 24.4% in 1700 to 4.2% in 1950,[7] and its share of global industrial output declining from 25% in 1750 to 2% in 1900.[4]
According to economic historian Angus Maddison in Contours of the world economy, 1–2030 CE: essays in macro-economic history, India had the world's largest economy from 1 CE to 1000 CE. However, productivity did not grow during the period. Between 1000 and 1500, in the high medieval era (during the Delhi Sultanate), India began to experience GDP growth, but more slowly than East Asia, which overtook India to become the world's most productive region. Ming China and India remained the largest economies through 1600. India experienced its fastest economic growth under the Mughal Empire, during the 16th–18th centuries, boosting Mughal India above Qing China by 1700.[24]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_India
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks