USA launched 40 plus thomohawks at Syria

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Yesterday you were pro-Trump and proud, today you are against him. No offense but you sound like a weathervane.. you go whichever way the wind blows

Putin over anyone, this is internet and in internet Putin figure rules among virtual dwellers, you can notice this pattern everywhere not solely in TA.

[Sacrificed Ram]

That did not happen. Only fuel, runways and jets were targeted. The professionally made rockets won't cause a tragedy when they are blown up. They rely on multi-stage processes for dispersing Sarin. If a Tomahawk missle is dropped on a Sarin warhead, nothing will happen. Even if some Sarin was not destroyed and was dispersed, it is in a wide open airspace where there is low population density. Few people are likely to be killed.

Until this moment the use of sarin is only a turkish allegation, there are many claims of Syria using rustic and improvised barrel bombs those capable to carry chemical agents, most specifically chlorine gas.

[Tschaikisten]

USA launched missiles without UN permission? No way, Russian propaganda

[Grab the Gauge]

Until this moment the use of sarin is only a turkish allegation, there are many claims of Syria using rustic and improvised barrel bombs those capable to carry chemical agents, most specifically chlorine gas.

Chlorine gas in barrel bombs is nowhere near deadly enough to cause the fatalities that were seen here. This was a high-toxicity modern nerve gas. Those types of attakcs usually kill less than 10 people, we've seen them before:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_K...hemical_attack

[Grab the Gauge]

People are looking for a million different far-stretched alternative explanations to this, when it is plain to see that this was a sarin gas attack delivered by high-grade military rockets. People just can't stand to see a strong, good country assault a weak, bad, inferior country. There is a word for people who unwaveringly identify with weak, bad things: we call them neurotics. Even if Assad didn't commit this specific atrocity, he is still a piece of shit, and the entire Syrian society is incompetent, and Syrian people do not deserve their own "sovreignty." What is happening here is a strong, competent country is reaching in and asserting dominance oved a weak, mismanaged country, who's failure to maintain a civil society has contributed to a global retard refugee crisis and the growth of a terrorist organization. So fuck Syria, and fuck all the shitty little terrorist-spawning countries.

[Sacrificed Ram]

Chlorine gas in barrel bombs is nowhere near deadly enough to cause the fatalities that were seen here. This was a high-toxicity modern nerve gas. Those types of attakcs usually kill less than 10 people, we've seen them before:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_K...hemical_attack

As you said, these syrian rebels with 79 IQ can have suffered an accident trying to manipulate sarin and the gas was expelled in their own faces, and everybody is trying to blame Assad.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Similar case of thrown chemical weapons had occurred in Kosova during 90', when sarin was used against Albanian students by serb apparatus, as can be seen it has enormous effect on nerve system.

[Grab the Gauge]

As you said, these syrian rebels with 79 IQ can have suffered an accident trying to manipulate sarin and the gas was expelled in their own faces, and everybody is trying to blame Assad.

Has anyone here ever considered that maybe Assad is accountible for the condition of his own country? In most countries, when elected leaders cause the country to take a wrong turn, they are ejected. Even if Assad has nothing to do with this attack, he is still liable for having absolutely no control over his own country, which has caused a global retard refugee crisis, several terrorist attacks outside Syria, etc. You don't get to play Preisdent forever, while your country burns to the ground. The US has taken the kiddie gloves off and doing what should have been done years ago, which is to be the only adult in the room and to drain the swamp of incompetence in the Levant.

[Sacrificed Ram]

Has anyone here ever considered that maybe Assad is accountible for the condition of his own country? In most countries, when elected leaders cause the country to take a wrong turn, they are ejected. Even if Assad has nothing to do with this attack, he is still liable for having absolutely no control over his own country, which has caused a global retard refugee crisis, several terrorist attacks outside Syria, etc. You don't get to play Preisdent forever, while your country burns to the ground. The US has taken the kiddie gloves off and doing what should have been done years ago, which is to be the only adult in the room and to drain the swamp of incompetence in the Levant.

I want listen this words again when California secession occur.

[MissMischief]

Can anybody give a logical answer as to why the Syrian Government would launch a chemical attack when it was winning via conventional means and the threat of US military action had receded?

Why would Assad launch a chemical attack which by no account gives him any military advantage?

The Western media and governments are quick off the mark to condemn Assad without firm evidence of his involvement. Syria has, under UN monitoring, already surrendered up its chemical weapons. Why use them now and risk world opprobrium?