2
The legacy of Ataturk was always a very thin sham. Ataturk was an authoritarian nationalist. He was even against economic liberalism. He didn't come up with a new ideology replacing Islam, he just changed the administrative system which worked for a short amount of time. He reformed the government, educational system, economy, the legal system, abolished the sharia courts, abolished Islamic headwear, abolished all forms of slavery practiced at the time, abolished every title of esteem such as sheikh, and made certain that every citizen had equal rights before the eyes of the law. He wasn't a great thinker and innovator, but just a copier and implementer of existing Western ideas.
Ataturk worship is pushed on modern Turks because "Turkish" is actually a very weak identity. They all speak the language but the Ottoman Empire was a cosmopolitan multi-ethnic empire. After WW1 the only way they could stop the complete breakup and partitioning of the empire was to shove this secular nationalist ideology down everyone's throat and commit mass genocide of minorities. Several minority groups were completely wiped out/kicked out. Several languages were banned. Forced name changes for citizens, places, and even animals and plants, to make them all sound turkish.
The whole "democratic, secular Ataturk legacy" thing is basically a myth thats been going for almost 100 years but is falling apart at the seams. It only worked while the going was good, when they were able to subdue all opposition.
Erdogan simply endeared himself with the Turkish people by uplifting many people out of poverty and building modern infrastructure, but his goodwill was burned up when he became combative with his neighbours and global superpowers, once the economy took a hit, something most Turks use as a barometer for political success, the writing was on the wall.
Bookmarks