DNA of Czechs

[Voskos]

lol, there's no such thing as czechs. they're bohemicans

[Mikula]

lol, there's no such thing as czechs. they're bohemicans

Dont troll. Czechs from Moravia and Silesia are not Bohemians

[Syky]

Hello Mikula, I started to discuss Czech autosomal DNA on Eupedia.
You probably don't know that I am not only your Moravian brother, I am also your Murk brother!

[Dick]

Hello Mikula, I started to discuss Czech autosomal DNA on Eupedia.
You probably don't know that I am not only your Moravian brother, I am also your Murk brother!

I like your ydna. Rethel will too.

[Rethel]

You probably don't know that I am not only your Moravian brother, I am also your Murk brother!

He is Głąbczyc, not Morawian

What is it Murk?

[Proto-Shaman]

OK proto-Basques and proto-Iberians

you can find Basques in a theory called "Arbins": http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperIn...?paperID=19567

member Litvin is one of them, but he still has identity crisis. He isn't aware of the fact that Arbins spoke agglutinative languages in history, but Indo-Europeans don't.

[Rethel]

you can find Basques in a theory called "Arbins": http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperIn...?paperID=19567 member Litvin is one of them, but he still has identity crisis. He isn't aware of the fact that Arbins spoke agglutinative languages in history, but Indo-Europeans don't.

[Proto-Shaman]

whats up flexive subhuman

[Fantomas]

And what do you expect about them?

The most ancient documented location of Iberians, Basques and Celts (the main representatives of Arbins and the the most distinctive group in the IE family) needs an explanation. But the Kurgan hypothesis can not do it.

[Fantomas]

you can find Basques in a theory called "Arbins": http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperIn...?paperID=19567

member Litvin is one of them, but he still has identity crisis. He isn't aware of the fact that Arbins spoke agglutinative languages in history, but Indo-Europeans don't.

At the arrival to Iberia (4800 ybp) the M269 subclade split off M51 and soon thereafter the L11 downstream subclades. These populations became known as the Bell Beakers and moved north, along with the newly arisen subclades of P312 and L21 (which split off within a few centuries after P312). Those subclades and their downstream clades have effectively, without major interruptions, populated Europe (the smooth haplotype trees demonstrate the near non-stop proliferation of R1b haplotypes in Europe). They are evidenced from the Atlantic eastward to the Balkans, Carpathian Mountains, present day Poland to the western border of the Russian Plain and up to the Baltic Sea.

It correlates with archaeology as well. One of the keystone of "steppe hypothezis" says that Beakers evolved from Cordeds in Lowlands, but in reality it's not the case. The earliest maritime Beakers came by sea routes from west and developed single grave practice independently from eastern tradition. Moreover there're long time expansion from coastlands into heartland, it can explain spread of Arbins and Centum languages in Northern and Central Europe