Japan says Shinto 'human deity, has Turkic Ashina origin

[Böri]

When İ read Japanese bloggers etc İ think Japanese people dont want to see themselves group with Filipino, China, Hindu or Mongolians. They try to find Turkic connections for their 'human-gods, or even emperor. So people you see Europe to Japan it's the same everywhere, just like Frank Crusaders who fell 'in love, of their enemies the Seljuk Turks even pretended that Turks must have common origins with Franks LoL
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...-Germanic-race

[Dandelion]

Speaking of Austronesians. There does exists a plausible hypothesis that Japanese as a language is to have an Austronesian substratum. They might have originally been alike to Filipinos. Linguists see parallels in phonology.

[Taiji]

When İ read Japanese bloggers etc İ think Japanese people dont want to see themselves group with Filipino, China, Hindu or Mongolians.

Oh really?



Sorry for wrecking your wet dreams

[Böri]

Oh really?


Sorry for wrecking your wet dreams

Mmmmm It's what İ noted I mean China and Japan disliking each other for historical reasons. Japanese and Koreans are like offended when you find similarity with Chinese.



I dont care btw. The OP is Japanese source and they pretend that Shinto human-god had Turkic Ashina origins.

[Dandelion]

Mmmmm It's what İ noted I mean China and Japan disliking each other for historical reasons. Japanese and Koreans are like offended when you find similarity with Chinese.



I dont care btw. The OP is Japanese source and they pretend that Shinto human-god had Turkic Ashina origins.

Scene is from a Chinese film btw.

[Turkminator]

The kinship between Japanese and Turks is undisputed in the serious science. For a Japanese linguistics student, it's much easier to learn the Turkish language than the Chinese -visa versa.

[Al-Meksiki]

Speaking of Austronesians. There does exists a plausible hypothesis that Japanese as a language is to have an Austronesian substratum. They might have originally been alike to Filipinos. Linguists see parallels in phonology.

Austronesian substratum is extremely likely, and I would not at all be surprised if Austronesians had a presence in the Islands.

I've heard that the Emishi and Ezo/Ainu show greater physical similarities to the people of Oceania than to Mainland Asia as well

[Taiji]

I dont care btw. The OP is Japanese source and they pretend that Shinto human-god had Turkic Ashina origins.

Don't worry about little Taiji being a know-it-all, my fingers jut itched

I enjoy your posts about East Asia/China/Mongolia/Siberia, especially the more "controversial" ones. Also really love it when you and Anatolian Stallion demonstrate Turkish mysticism and talk about Turkic stuff and Turkish wolves under a Turkish sky. All that's missing is a nice, loud howl from you guys but it's good enough.

Please don't stop posting. You guys make the forum interesting. And I sincerely mean this

[itilvolga]

The real and accepted theory of the origins of the Japanese people is that their ancestors originated somewhere in southern China in the 3rd century BC and mixed with the local Jomon people that lived on the island of Japan since the neolithic period. The Jomon people were racially paleo-Mongoloid people, and they would have looked the most similar to the south-east Asiatics like Filipinos, Vietnamese and etc.

Koreans, Nivkhis, Eskimos, Mongolians, many Siberians, Japanese, and Northern Chinese are all Northern Neomongoloids. The transition began 9,000 YBP in the north. The Ainu represent the base type that transitioned to Neomongoloid in the north.

[Luca]

The real and accepted theory of the origins of the Japanese people is that their ancestors originated somewhere in southern China in the 3rd century BC and mixed with the local Jomon people that lived on the island of Japan since the neolithic period. The Jomon people were racially paleo-Mongoloid people, and they would have looked the most similar to the south-east Asiatics like Filipinos, Vietnamese and etc.

Actually the modern Japanese people have nothing to do with "Jomon" people, as I have never heard of them. Instead you might want to look into the Ainu people, which were an ausraloid race living in Japan, before Korean settlers colonized the island, bringing mongol DNA to the isolated island.
And as we know, mongols are related to turks, proving that Japanese people, must have at least some (rather big) connection to turkish people.

"accepts all the religions of the world and reveres the great prophets, teachers, and sons of God, because it recognizes the same divine inspiration in all."

that's pretty much hinduism though

[...]the Altaic language family is largely dismissed

More evidence supports it's inclusion, that goes against it.

Koreans, Nivkhis, Eskimos, Mongolians, many Siberians, Japanese, and Northern Chinese are all Northern Neomongoloids. The transition began 9,000 YBP in the north. The Ainu represent the base type that transitioned to Neomongoloid in the north.

Good guess, but the Ainu actually represent the ancient Australoid people, inhabiting Japan. They do not have anything to do with modern japanese, because they were socially excluded of modern japanese society (and still are).
Modern japanese are just Korean settlers, which in turn have mongolid origins.