Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: China bans Islamic baby names in Muslim majority Xinjiang province

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Kahraman.M
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Turkic
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Country
    Turkey
    Y-DNA
    O-M176
    Taxonomy
    CM-Pontid.
    Age
    28
    Gender
    Posts
    3,731
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,796
    Given: 4,238

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zhaoyun View Post
    China's government really only cares about religion if it infringes on their sovereignty. They have anti-Islamic laws for the Uighurs, but not for other Muslim groups like the Huis or Salars or Dongxiang, etc. Because the Uighurs are the only ones actively agitating for independence.

    I dont know, if its true but my family members say we have one in our family, an ethnicity Uyghur who living for more then 200 years, this would be explain my Y-DNA haplogroup and my gedmatch result. The time change the future for the Uyghurs. Yasasin Turan.

  2. #22
    canaan ariel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    01-03-2018 @ 06:16 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    levantine
    Ethnicity
    hebrew
    Ancestry
    ancient israelite
    Country
    Israel
    Taxonomy
    east med
    Gender
    Posts
    5,223
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,360
    Given: 3,043

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zhaoyun View Post
    Well, China is the only civilization to have successfully assimilated the Jews. LOL

    There is an ancient community in Kaifeng but I think they lost touch with their roots long ago, but are now rediscovering it.

    I know one of them who born in israel his family own of one of the best chinese restaurants in israel the restaurant is not kosher lol.amazing food.i love the authentic chinese food.

  3. #23
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    frankhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Inselaffe
    Country
    New Zealand
    Y-DNA
    R-U106
    mtDNA
    HV18
    Gender
    Posts
    11,064
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7,648
    Given: 10,376

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zhaoyun View Post
    I'm not sure if they are officially banned but they rarely venture out to the Kashgar region. Xinjiang has primarily two different zones, there is Beijiang (Northern Xinjiang) centered around Urumqi where there is a lot of Han influence, the Uighurs and Kazakhs there are also pretty sinicized. And then there is Nanjiang (Southern Xinjiang), centered around Kashgar which is the historic Uighur stronghold, that region is still very strongly Uighur.

    Anyways, as for the rules banning names, it's stupid, but I guess they are paranoid about the rising extremism.
    Interesting stuff. The media really doesn't define north from south. Instead emphasizing and demonizing the Han migration into the region. The lesson here is no different than on any other day, don't rely on the media for accurate reporting.

  4. #24
    Veteran Member Methmatician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    01-30-2021 @ 01:59 AM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    Great Britain
    Gender
    Posts
    8,413
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,131
    Given: 4,234

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ariel View Post
    all the religions banned there
    Did Radio Free Asia tell you that?

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Diyar-ı Rum
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Ar-Rum, Ottoman, Byzantine
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    25% N.Macedonian, 25% Albanian + 50% Dalmatia Slavic mixed Vlach
    Country
    Bosnia
    Region
    Dalmatia
    Y-DNA
    I2
    mtDNA
    H28
    Taxonomy
    Dinarid + Pontid
    Politics
    Neo-Ottomanism
    Hero
    Tzepeles Komnenos, Mehmed II
    Religion
    Ottoman Islam
    Gender
    Posts
    17,720
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,216
    Given: 5,754

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Now we should ban Jewish names in Europe.

  6. #26
    Veteran Member zhaoyun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Last Online
    04-09-2019 @ 02:14 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Sinid
    Ethnicity
    Han Chinese
    Ancestry
    The Celestial Empire
    Country
    United States
    Region
    California
    mtDNA
    You can mtDNA this!
    Taxonomy
    Nordsinid/Tungid
    Hero
    Yo momma last night
    Gender
    Posts
    14,678
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 28,799
    Given: 25,904

    4 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frankhammer View Post
    Interesting stuff. The media really doesn't define north from south. Instead emphasizing and demonizing the Han migration into the region. The lesson here is no different than on any other day, don't rely on the media for accurate reporting.
    Well, the media simplifies things. While it is true that Han migration to Xinjiang has increased, it's really just to the urban areas of Urumqi and it's surroundings. Xinjiang, first of all, is a huge territory, it is the size of Alaska. Uighurs, at least modern Uighurs, were not originally from Northern Xinjiang. That region was once known as Dzungharia, and the Dzungar Mongols were pretty much genocided by the Emperor Qianlong during the Qing Dynasty because of a deep Manchu-Dzungar enmity. After the Dzungar men were basically genocided (the Kalmyks in Russia are descended from the surviving Dzungars who fled), Qianlong invited Uighur farmers from Southern Xinjiang, or Kashgaria, to come up North to settle and till the land and even gave them Dzungar women to take as wives. That's why when you travel to Xinjiang, the Uighurs in the North look part Mongol, they are much more Mongoloid, like this:



    While the Uighurs from the South (basically the same people as Uzbeks) are much more Caucasoid:



    Han Chinese have had deep historical ties to Northern Xinjiang, as that region was part of the Han Empire and many great Buddhist cities once flourished there, like Gaochang. But Hans have little historic ties to Southern Xinjiang. However, even in Northern Xinjiang, the Hans are basically just in the cities, the countryside are still by far majority Uighur or Kazakhs.

    Same in Tibet, the Han Chinese and Hui Moslems (who are the main commercial classes) are usually only found in Lhasa. The countryside is all ethnic Tibetan.
    Last edited by zhaoyun; 04-25-2017 at 05:46 PM.

  7. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Last Online
    06-20-2020 @ 04:44 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Euromutt (Celto-Germanic, Romance, Hellenic)
    Ethnicity
    White European
    Ancestry
    Sicilian, French, British Isles/Ireland, minor German
    Country
    United States
    Y-DNA
    Haplogroup G-L30
    mtDNA
    Haplogroup H24
    Taxonomy
    Nordo-Med
    Hero
    Camille Paglia
    Religion
    Cultural Catholicism & Orthodox Christianity
    Age
    29
    Gender
    Posts
    224
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 129
    Given: 13

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    As someone else said, the Han play to win, like it or not. It's actually not a stupid policy; it'll probably work - the Uyghurs are too small a minority to actively resist the Chinese government, and they won't outlast them. And the Chinese do not have the "human rights" hangups we here in the West do. They'll do what they want with their Muslim agitators and won't think twice about doing it.

    I also find it highly hypocritical for Human Rights Watch and other Western organizations to suddenly be all up in arms about Chinese policy toward religious minorities when the Christians have been on the receiving end of MUCH worse for decades - with nary a peep out of these organizations. But suddenly not being able to name your child "Jihad" is tantamount to the gravest religious oppression. Puh-leeze. Western media is already in a state of dhimmitude/complete subservience to a radical Islamic agenda. Luckily, the Chinese government and media are not.

  8. #28
    Veteran Member zhaoyun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Last Online
    04-09-2019 @ 02:14 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Sinid
    Ethnicity
    Han Chinese
    Ancestry
    The Celestial Empire
    Country
    United States
    Region
    California
    mtDNA
    You can mtDNA this!
    Taxonomy
    Nordsinid/Tungid
    Hero
    Yo momma last night
    Gender
    Posts
    14,678
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 28,799
    Given: 25,904

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Inquizzzitor View Post
    As someone else said, the Han play to win, like it or not. It's actually not a stupid policy; it'll probably work - the Uyghurs are too small a minority to actively resist the Chinese government, and they won't outlast them. And the Chinese do not have the "human rights" hangups we here in the West do. They'll do what they want with their Muslim agitators and won't think twice about doing it.

    I also find it highly hypocritical for Human Rights Watch and other Western organizations to suddenly be all up in arms about Chinese policy toward religious minorities when the Christians have been on the receiving end of MUCH worse for decades - with nary a peep out of these organizations. But suddenly not being able to name your child "Jihad" is tantamount to the gravest religious oppression. Puh-leeze. Western media is already in a state of dhimmitude/complete subservience to a radical Islamic agenda. Luckily, the Chinese government and media are not.
    I don't even really understand the point of this law, because no Uighurs would name their kids Jihad or Mecca anyways, that's just dumb.

    It seems like this is a typical boneheaded law created by Northern Chinese rednecks along with local Uighur collaborators who are trying to prove they are doing something about Islamic extremism, without really doing anything. Most of the people in the Northern Chinese countryside are real rednecks, and boneheaded behavior is pretty widespread. It's less so in Southern China because the natives there are much more business and commercial minded.

  9. #29
    Veteran Member Sekarotuinen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Last Online
    08-17-2017 @ 12:06 PM
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Finno-Ugric/Semitic
    Ethnicity
    Finnish & Levantine Arab
    Ancestry
    Paternal: Eastern Finland (likely with Russian admixture) Maternal: Palestine
    Country
    United States
    Region
    California
    mtDNA
    X2e2b
    Taxonomy
    Nordid-Baltid-Arabid Mongrel
    Politics
    Right Wing - Libertarian
    Hero
    Ronald Reagan
    Religion
    Islam
    Gender
    Posts
    3,368
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,316
    Given: 156

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    China is anti-religious, apparently they bulldoze churches and mosques regularly, so this isnt surprising.
    I suppose it's their country, so thry can do as they please.

  10. #30
    Senior Member Taiji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Last Online
    07-16-2018 @ 02:53 PM
    Ethnicity
    Sino-Tibetan
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    428
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 883
    Given: 1,765

    4 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zhaoyun View Post
    I don't even really understand the point of this law, because no Uighurs would name their kids Jihad or Mecca anyways, that's just dumb.

    It seems like this is a typical boneheaded law created by Northern Chinese rednecks along with local Uighur collaborators who are trying to prove they are doing something about Islamic extremism, without really doing anything. Most of the people in the Northern Chinese countryside are real rednecks, and boneheaded behavior is pretty widespread. It's less so in Southern China because the natives there are much more business and commercial minded.
    There really is no point in this law because in all likelihood it doesn't exist AKA fake news. Let's play a game of Snopes.

    Take note of the words in bold. Then take note of the large, bold words.
    A document entitled “Naming Rules for Ethnic Minorities” prohibits names used by Muslim parents around the world including Imam, Hajj, Islam, Quran, Saddam, Medina and Islam, Radio Free Asia (RFA) reported.
    Point 1: Imam, Islam, Quran aren't Uyghur names. None of the Muslim minorities in China have these names.
    Point 2: The name Islam is mentioned twice. Bad editing and mistakes are usually a sign of a lack of credibility and dishonesty.
    Point 3: Radio Free Asia. This is one of the most biased "news" source out there. It's a very good example of a fake news channel, full of propaganda, low on facts. Only the voices of dissidents are considered when an unbiased channel has much more extensive coverage.

    I do agree there is some discrimination and genuine grievances that Uyghurs have. However, it's absolutely nothing compared to what goes on in Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Do note that not all Uyghurs are pushing or even want independence and in fact many have become well integrated citizens of China. However, there certainly are some who do want independence and you could say they are radicalized. Also some of the Uyghur independence movements ARE terrorists and the true genocidal racists. Ever wondered why ethnic Hui, Mongols and Kazakhs aren't very sympathetic with the Uyghur cause?

    This is a report from a witness in the 2009 riots, http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/03/02/...r-in-xinjiang/
    He could hear shouts from below, chants of "Kill the Han, smash the Hui [another Islamic minority], drive the Mongols out." I heard similar versions of the chant later from other witnesses. Although sometimes the order of other groups was switched up, or the verb changed ("Cut the Kazakhs!"), the first clause was always the same. He stopped looking out of the window once the gunfire started, sporadic bursts in the night after the People’s Armed Police, China’s paramilitary force, entered the city.
    Here's a report of identifying the aftermath, http://trotskyistplatform.com/Urumqi.html. I don't agree that the Uyghurs were anti-communists but the number and identity of victims is accurate. Most of those slain weren't Uyghur rioters but innocent civilians.

    This is of course something that's not mentioned by the Deep State media. The narrative is often a racist, oppressive majority out to destroy harmless Uyghur freedom fighters. In reality the Uyghur separatists are anything but. Of course if Han Chinese acted as irrationally as the separatists and applied the same rhetoric, they could've easily treated the Uyghurs as non human and exterminated them all. The fact they're not doing this actually speaks against the Chinese plan of genociding Uyghurs. Uyghurs are still people and deserve to be treated as such. I feel if things do work out for the best, Uyghurs probably will end up like Inner Mongolians, Salar, Hui and live in peace with other ethnics while retaining their culture. Despite the hiccups, Tibetans are much better off these days then they were in the past.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-15-2019, 03:07 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-28-2016, 09:12 PM
  3. Replies: 63
    Last Post: 10-03-2016, 01:08 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •