0
Results are quite different now in many respects, also compare the components to each other.
NW is now even closer to West Asian than before (0,037) and further removed from North Eastern (0,045), North Eastern is now almost as close to Basque as to NW.
That points to what I said before about the components relations, but in this analysis, which seems to be more detailed, it becomes even more clear that North Western has much closer relations to the Neolithic-Southern components than North Eastern.
If comparing with SW Asian, NE Euro is much further away with 0,067 than NW Euro with 0,048 - almost the same distance as between NW and NE with 0,045.
I don't know how this can be (if comparing with the older analysis), but this would really put NE Euro in the category of the older European population elements or an isolated one, while NW is the component of an expansion (Mesolithic, from specific refugia? Neolithic, even Metal Age influences?) much closer related to the Neolithic-Southern components.
Well, let's look for new surprises in new runs
Bookmarks