1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,904 Given: 4,896 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,234 Given: 978 |
R1B is still the most dominant haplogroup in Sicily (south Italy):
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,904 Given: 4,896 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,234 Given: 978 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,904 Given: 4,896 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 873 Given: 394 |
Some R1b-U152 subclades
Z56 (Italic)
Z36 (Gaulish)
I don't know who made these maps, if anyone know please tell me so I can properly put their name here
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,904 Given: 4,896 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 873 Given: 394 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,904 Given: 4,896 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 873 Given: 394 |
Yes, no doubt Z56 is italic
I think both L2 and Z36 can be associated with gauls.
Why do you think Z36 is germanic? I think it correlates perfectly with the gaulish settlement in Northern Italy, maybe you've got this impression because there's a hotspot near the black forest?
Look at this passage, by Eupedia:
"This is probably the migration that brought the Italic-speaking tribes to Italy, who would have belonged mainly the Z56 clade of R1b-U152. During the Iron Age, the expansion of the La Tène culture from Switzerland is associated with the diffusion of the Z36 branch, which would generate the Belgae around modern Belgium and in the Rhineland, the Gauls in France, and the Cisalpine Celts in Italy."
I guess if Z36 were germanic it would be higher in Triveneto region rather than Piedmont and Lombardy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks