0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,038 Given: 995 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,846 Given: 2,495 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,378 Given: 3,032 |
Again you're interpreting wrong what I've said.
In the last decades of XIX century and beggining of XX there were more Italians. Of course if you take all the period from the independence to today the Portuguese are the most common. But the ''boom'' of the immigration was the last decades of XIX century.
Read the data, please. Even the first graphic you've posted shows more Italians than Portuguese.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,362 Given: 11,959 |
Actually, Brazil is the only latin american country with big genetic studies (Candela or Epigen cohorts).
And while i understand a north brazilian can be "white" and a south brazilian can be "black" there are clear regional patterns if we talk about average people. Some days ago i posted a big study done in Fortaleza (Northeast) with several samples used (1.500 from 5 different studies) and the people was very homogeneously pardo.
Same happens in a big study in Salvador de Bahia with most people being mulattos.
The southern studies tend to have A LOT of people scoring 100-80% european. The regional differences seem clear.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,362 Given: 11,959 |
Yeah obivously i said mulattos because i meant peoiple with high SSA.
My point is that the average person in the north brazilian studies is heavily mixed and the average person in the south brazilian studies is heavily euro. That was the point.
If in 2 studies with around 3.000 samples (1.500 Salvador 1.500 Fortaleza) less that 5% is over 80% euro that means something. In the other hand southern studies have plenty of people scoring over 80% euro. And i am talking about the new big studies not the old shitty studies.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,378 Given: 3,032 |
Interesting. But I think that we need to know more information about the samples (because neughbour cities can have totally different populations). Most genetic studies that I have seen made in Brazil till now are totally bullshit. Do you have the sources of these studies? Sounds interesting, I would like to see.
And you're right, certainly way more people in the South can be considered white than in the North.
My personal estimative is that the ''white'' population (+ 90% Caucasoid) is around 80% in the South and something like 15-20% in the North.
We can made a comparison and say that South Brazil is like Uruguay racially, Northern Brazil like Mexico and Northeast like Dominican Republic.
Southeast/CenterWest would be ''Brazil'' properly. Divided in more equal proportions depending on the region/state (Goiás for example have been genetic tested and they are more than 80% Euro).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,362 Given: 11,959 |
All this studies have a lot of samples, are new and have good amount of markers. Notice how Fortaleza and Salvador are very different from the rest.
Pelotas, Bambui, Salvador
http://www.pnas.org/content/112/28/8696/F1.large.jpg
https://www.researchgate.net/profile...-shows-the.png
Bambui, Minas Gerais
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/art...01&size=inline
Bapendi, Minas Gerais
http://i.imgur.com/ejMBYRc.png
Fortaleza
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...n/msw249f4.jpg
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,378 Given: 3,032 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks