RN97's FtDNA results; myOrigins and Ancient origins

[Kelmendasi]

But Germanic Y-DNA is from his Norwegian ancestors.

He has Norwegian, Romanian and "German" ancestors.

That German side could be partially Jewish.

East Germans also score some East European as well.

Norwegians can also score East European.

Isn't his German ancestor his paternal ancestor though?

[Catholic Riffs]

Buy Y37

[Peterski]

Isn't his German ancestor his paternal ancestor though?

No. And even if that was the case, his German ancestor could have a Jewish mother (for example).

[RN97]

Its' pretty certain you're part Askhenazi. FTDNA is very deep and reliable test especially after recent updates.
Nothing to feel bad about as they're overarchivers in almost every aspect of civilisation there is.

But it can't be that high and not show up on 23andme and it also wouldn't make sense plotting wise. These are all the plots with me in it. Just think about me as 8% jewish. How can it be?




And what about the Turkish admixture? Where does that come into play?

[Kelmendasi]

No. And even if that was the case, his German ancestor could have a Jewish mother (for example).

True

[Peterski]

If you were just 50% Romanian + 50% Norwegian you should rather plot somewhere here, right?:

http://i.imgur.com/rq0c7Pd.png

[Jana]

But it can't be that high and not show up on 23andme and it also wouldn't make sense plotting wise. These are all the plots with me in it. Just think about me as 8% jewish. How can it be?




And what about the Turkish admixture? Where does that come into play?

23andme goes onnly 500 years back and IMO FTDNA is much superior test. You shouldn't put much trust in calculators anyway, this is interesting but amateur stuff.
While companies are ran by professionals and in most you do get Askhenazi. Btw, why shouldn't you plot as Central European still ? Askhenazi admixture is like Sicilian, not really MENA, and if you have it's it's only small part.

Turkish admixture is unlikely, don't think so. People who mixed with Turks had children that were considered Turkish and wouldn't be able to assmiliate in host society (like Romanian). Most of them were expelled to Anatolia during Balkan wars.

[RN97]

If you were just 50% Romanian + 50% Norwegian you should rather plot somewhere here, right?:

http://i.imgur.com/rq0c7Pd.png

I do get that, but that's one that plots me furthest than the average. I meant that I basically don't plot more in the direction of the azkhenazi jews. How would jewish admixture shift me in that direction? IDK really anymore.

[kingjohn]

And what about the Turkish admixture? Where does that come into play?[/QUOTE]

Bulgarians Romanians and some Serbs score Asia minor in my origins 2.0
this component was in Romania even before the dacians your ancestors


try one to many in option gedmatch if you have a lot of jewish matches { aschenazi bottlneck endogomy} than it the real deal....

[RN97]

23andme goes onnly 500 years back and IMO FTDNA is much superior test. You shouldn't put much trust in calculators anyway, this is interesting but amateur stuff.
While companies are ran by professionals and in most you do get Askhenazi. Btw, why shouldn't you plot as Central European still ? Askhenazi admixture is like Sicilian, not really MENA, and if you have it's it's only small part.

Turkish admixture is unlikely, don't think so. People who mixed with Turks had children that were considered Turkish and wouldn't be able to assmiliate in host society (like Romanian). Most of them were expelled to Anatolia during Balkan wars.

But I score 9% asia minor which is Turkish on FtDNA