March of the Titans - debate

[lei.talk]

MARCH of the TITANS

I'm sick of having this waved at me as though it were an impeccable authority, so...

to better understand the motivation of your initial post,
would you - please - provide url-links
to incidents of arthur kemp's March of the Titans
being "waved" at you as a reference-text
at the apricity, njörd eriksson's skaði or - even - don black's

...habitually linking to it does a good deal to discredit yourself and anything you might say, which is a damned shame.

please, provide url-links
of my citing arthur kemp's March of the Titans
as evidence/proof or authoritative text in any conversation.
*

[lei.talk]

Originally Posted by The Wagnerian Ruled by Nordicist? Seriously?
If anything it's the opposite -
did you see that stupid "march of the white race" thread?
More than half the forum ripped into the guy
because he was Nordicist.

thankfully,
loki preserved all twenty pages
of those unsubstantiated derogations,

rather than delete the hate-full drivel,
as a perpetually embarrassing illustration of the hollowness
of their attacks.

how many of those critics
copy&pasted any of the original text
(proof they might have actually read a portion)?

in spite of an early and respect-full suggestion,
did a single critic post any evidence
in support of their contra-dictions?

why did no one simply point to the proof.

twenty pages of follow-the-leader opinionation.
*

[Matritensis]

More than half the forum ripped into the guy
because he was Nordicist.

I think it was actually because science fiction shouldn't be used in debates concerning real life.

[Ibericus]

Oh god , march of the titans again...Why give so much importance to such pile of bullshit

[Psychonaut]

I've only ready bits and pieces, but, regardless of it's veracity, I'd love to have the hardcover edition sitting on my bookshelf.

[Great Dane]

March of the Titans may not be a totally accurate history of the past but it is turning out to be the factual history of our era. And at least Arthur Kemp has done more then just goof off on internet fora.

[Blood Trinity]

Oh here we go... Classic "at least..." apologetics. What is so hard to understand? If Kemp isn't deliberately creating fantasies out of history in order to degrade the history of various EUROPEAN ethnic groups, he is at least not qualified to open his mouth or put pen to paper, if anything. Either way, I don't see the benefit in defending his work. The premise is absurd, and none of his "revelations" about the world today are anything new or insightful to anyone who has been interested in ethno-cultural nationalism or racialism for more than 5 minutes.

[Grumpy Cat]

March of the Titans may not be a totally accurate history of the past but it is turning out to be the factual history of our era. And at least Arthur Kemp has done more then just goof off on internet fora.

Like working as a police informant and snitching on other far-right groups?

[Loki]

I've only ready bits and pieces, but, regardless of it's veracity, I'd love to have the hardcover edition sitting on my bookshelf.

Costs $799 new?!?!

[lei.talk]

rather than replicate the wasted space
of all the previous threads
devoted to criticising arthur kemp's "March of the Titans",

on this thread
why do not the critics simply point to the proof :

1. copy&paste the errors of fact
   from "MARCH OF THE TITANS: A History of the White Race"
2. copy&paste the url-link
   to the page being quoted
3. then, copy&paste the contra-dicting proof
4. and copy&paste the url-link
   to the reference-material being quoted.

the reader does not need to be told
what to think - simply point to the proof.

if the administrators and moderators
will delete any posts
that make no attempt at fact-based rational discourse -

for the first time, progress will be made
on this topic.
*