0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,991 Given: 21,752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,848 Given: 3,647 |
I guess to you selling your child to slavery and an old pedofile is ok because the rest of the family benefits from that cash moeneys.
An 18 year old fighting in war is more acceptable than sex or marriage with a child.
A pedofile should never have or raise kids.
The role of parents are to raise children to be able to have skills to survive in society. Not sell their kids to pedofiles in the name of marriage.
Fathers are supposed to protect children. Not hand their children to pedos.
Woman cook and do the actual taking care of children.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 24,933 Given: 12,765 |
My maternal grandparents and aunt lived with my parents until I was 5/6. So it's not a foreign concept to me.
In Galician households women aren't subjugated. I've never seen my father or either grandfather lord over their wives. Everything is discussed or argued over. Although no doubt my father has the last word on what is to be done but that has to do with him bringing in most of the money. If it had been the other way around tthere is no way she would allow him to have the last word. Naturally - yes, naturally - who ever consistently brings home the money should have the last word.
If the father decided to use his child to keep the wealth within the family (cousin fucking) then that's exploitation of the child for financial reasons. The child is no different than cattle.Father should decide and responsible for what age his children are ready to get married
Father should decide and responsible for punitive actions.
How is using a child to seal a business deal by marriage not exploitation? The idea is to use the child as a bargaining chip. It's financially motivated.
Perhaps your historical past but not mine. I know for a fact my parents, grandparents, and great grandparents married people they knew and liked. They made the choice themselves. I know my great grandfather didn't like the woman one of his sons married. No one does, in fact. She's an annoying woman. But no one stopped him from making his own decisions.This was the case in the past, but you guys let go of this important responsibility and handed it over to some invisible bureacracy (which with an issue of a bill, can choose to pluck your 18 year old, mature or not, to fight and die in wars that may or may not directly matter to you).
The government doesn't force anyone to marry and so your talk about the state is irrelevant.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 23,148 Given: 18,117 |
That is your assumption. Many things could motivate arranged marriages besides finance, but if its a decision the daughter is not happy with, she has rights protecting her in the sharia.
it forces schools, vaccinations, and who you could marry...so yeah it is relevant.The government doesn't force anyone to marry and so your talk about the state is irrelevant.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 23,148 Given: 18,117 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,991 Given: 21,752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,991 Given: 21,752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,848 Given: 3,647 |
Girls shouldnt be worried getting married at 14.
They should be going to school or learning skills to help them get into a job market. When they are 21, then they should be allowed to marry because by then most people have some college background and or work experience.
The burden of being married is too much for a 14 year old girl when she should be developing her concious, education and skill set. At 21 she her mind will be more developed, educated, smarter and she will be experienced enough to make better decisions like marriage ect. She would also be better educated and experienced in knowing how to defend her self in any event shes being exploited.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 23,148 Given: 18,117 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks