Anti-Kurdish sentiment in Hadith

[Kamal900]

LOL "Turki" was used as an adjective by Arabs, meaning "handsome" in medieval Persian and Arabic sources. Turks were considered handsome by them. They even named their children "Turki".

Those Arabs had OTD - Off Turk Dilemma



You might be worshipping Europeans today, but your ancestors used to worship Turks. You guys always find someone to worship, don't you? For example you suck European members so hard that your mouth is full of their semen, but it was Turks whom your ancestors worshipped.

I've already told you in the other thread that I don't give much fuck about White people as a whole, and I told you that It was your kinsmen that first attacked me repeatedly back in late 2013 for simply disagreeing with some of your friends here. You keep parroting the same things over and over again despite on the fact that I told you to look at my lists of posts and threads that I made during my time here in this forum from the late 2013 to this day. While there are Arabs who did respect the Turks, but there are those Arabs that spoke ill against the Turks as well. It's not a one sided thing really.

[gültekin]

They also defeated the Turks in Central Asia, don't get too fast you idiot



How pathetic, muh stronk warriors so easily converted to Islam, don't forget the famous Babak Khorramdin that killed over 500.000 muslim soldiers during his rebellion.

Turks ruling Iranians for 9 centuries? Maybe for a few hundred years but the elite was barely Turkic and yet you adopted Persian language and customs because your own were shit and useless.

Still, the Sassanids defeated your dumbasses outnumbered, "muh stronk warriors" were annihilated by smaller cavalry army lol and even the Persian horse archers proved to be lethal against "muh türkic ppl strunk warriorz"

Yes, 9 centuries, starting with Seljuks. The Sassanids were not outnumbered, the wikipedia page is written by Iranian users themselves, the wikipedia itself is tired of these Iranian nationalist, it always states that the page is "exaggerated". It is impossible for nomadic people to outnumber Sassanids in any battle.

"Persian horse archers"? There was no such thing, even before the penetration of the Turkic tribes in the region the Persians used to deploy horse archers of Eastern Iranic origin (usually Dahae). You know nothing about the military history so shut the fuck up please. The horse archery is associated with Turks, not even the Mongols were able to take that title from us, let alone Persians whose armies were mostly consisted of local peasants/leviy infantry (named Paighan). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paygan --> these local peasants were the bulk of the Persian armies. They were ethnic Persian peasants who were used as cannon fodders.

[Böri]

maybe at the time most kurds were like yazidis? yazidis have been accused of being satanists for centuries

Not really otherwise it would explicitly say until they convert or it wouldn't mention the name of Kurds as an ethnicity. That hadith is practiced and given importance in history.
The proof is the Ottoman black eunuchs. They were all taken from a special tribe in Sudan (Nubia). Other Negro to avoid to be taken as slaves.

[Pahli]

Yes, 9 centuries, starting with Seljuks. The Sassanids were outnumbered, the wikipedia page is written by Iranian users themselves. It is impossible for nomadic people to outnumber Sassanids.

"Persian horse archers"? There was no such thing, even before the penetration of the Turkic tribes in the region the Persians used to deploy horse archers of Eastern Iranic origin (usually Dahae). You know nothing about the military history so shut the fuck up please. The horse archery is associated with Turks, not even the Mongols were able to take that title from us, let alone Persians whose armies were mostly consisted of local peasants/leviy infantry (named Paighan). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paygan --> these local peasants were the bulk of the Persian armies

LOL WAT? Are you seriously fucking retarded? Horse archery has been a thing among Persians since the Achaemenid Empire, even predates that. The Sassanids had different units for different regions but they still had Persian horse archers, so you should maybe shut your fucking mouth instead. Yes, the main bulk of the Persian army was of shit quality which is why they started losing battles / wars. I think you should stop shitting out of your mouth, I already put your dumb face in place in the Tatar thread, don't let this be another humiliation grandpa.

Sassanid horse archer (also used on the Western front against Romans and Arabs);



Horse archery has been with the Iranian people for way longer than Turks lol. Should I remind you of how the Parthians destroyed the Romans at the battle of Carrhae.

And lol, the Mongols chased the Turks out of Asia, they ran like fucking pussies unlike the Central Asian Iranians that at least stood up to fight them. Pussies.

[gültekin]

LOL WAT? Are you seriously fucking retarded? Horse archery has been a thing among Persians since the Achaemenid Empire, even predates that. The Sassanids had different units for different regions but they still had Persian horse archers, so you should maybe shut your fucking mouth instead. Yes, the main bulk of the Persian army was of shit quality which is why they started losing battles / wars. I think you should stop shitting out of your mouth, I already put your dumb face in place in the Tatar thread, don't let this be another humiliation grandpa.

Sassanid horse archer (also used on the Western front against Romans and Arabs);

So what? Assyrians also had horse archers even before the Acheamanid Persians? None of them were horse-archer based armies. Byzantines had horse archers too (Hippo toxotai)! The bulk of Oghuz/Seljuk armies of the period were consisted of tribal horse archers, the core of the army were elite heavy cavalry, unlike the Sassanid armies where horse archers were auxiliaries from Eastern Iranic tribes (Dahae etc) and formed a very small segment of the army. Persian armies were peasant-based (Paighan) armies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paygan

Sassanids used to deploy horse archers, but they were usually of Dahae origin, not Persian. The Persian segment of the army were called "Paighans", these peasant infantry were recruited from Persian peasants and formed the bulk of the army.

[Pahli]

So what? Assyrians also had horse archers even before the Acheamanid Persians? None of them were horse-archer based armies. Byzantines had horse archers too (Hippo toxotai)! The bulk of Oghuz/Seljuk armies of the period were consisted of tribal horse archers, the core of the army were elite heavy cavalry, unlike the Sassanid armies where horse archers were auxiliaries from Eastern Iranic tribes (Dahae etc) and formed a very small segment of the army. Persian armies were peasant-based (Paighan) armies.

Sassanids used to deploy horse archers, but they were usually of Dahae origin, not Persian. The Persian segment of the army were called "Paighans", these peasant infantry were recruited from Persian peasants and formed the bulk of the army.

You failed to understand Persians had their own horse archers, but they shifted towards heavy melee cavalry after the Sassanid Empire came to place, that doesn't mean they didn't have their own horse archers, but they were shifting the army to deal with the Byzantines and their melee cavalry was quite efficient which is why horse archery fell out of favour during some time, but was yet not abandoned by Persians (and I'm not even Persian lol).

[Böri]

Book written about the Kurds is named after the belief over the origins of Kurds.



So the Scythian myth for Kurds must be dropped.

[Pahli]

Book written about the Kurds is named after the belief over the origins of Kurds.



So the Scythian myth for Kurds must be dropped.

No Kurd here claimed they were descendants of Scythians lol and if they did they are wrong unless they have something to back it up with.

[Dandelion]

A Hadith by a scholar who has the most following among Shi'a muslims today. I'm shocked, I thought Islam forbade ethnic chauvinism. A Sunni radical would say: 'that is because Shi'a are no muslims.'

[Dandelion]

How come all Hadith scholars were Persian, by the way? For a non-muslim it makes it hard to think Persian culture hadn't influenced Islam long after Muhammad's death.