1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,922 Given: 18,998 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,922 Given: 18,998 |
Some of Scandinavian Hunter-Gatherers were Mongoloid:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ectody...ed_EDAR_allele
"In a 2015 study, three (of six) ancient DNA samples (7,900-7,500 BP) from Motala, Sweden, were found to carry the rs3827760 mutation.[10]"
But they were not R1. They were Non-Indo-European.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 54 Given: 193 |
Maps of the Indo-Europeans, R1a and R1b
Even the Proto-Indo-Europeans were practically 100% R1a or R1b. Out of 54 tested Proto-Indo-European males at Proto-Indo-European sites in Central and Eastern Europe, 48 were either R1a or R1b. That is over 88% accuracy that the Proto-Indo-Europeans were R1a and R1b. R1 is the Haplogroup of Indo-Europeans. The one I2a2 found out of the Yamna culture can be historically explained as a captured slave boy from the Native Europeans. He most certainly did not come from Southeast Asia like the Indo-European ancestors did looking non-white. There was also one Q found in Andronovo & Karasuk in Central Asia and some non-European haplogroups (xI, xE, xG, xN, xJ, xT, xQ, xR) in Corded Ware and in Andronovo & Karasuk at these Proto-Indo-European sites (sorry about the edit).
Take a look at a Indo-European tribe that did not conquer the Native Europeans like the Bashkirs, which are 73.5% Indo-European Haplogroup R. It is a Indo-European Haplogroup tribe that has Mongoloid features. Germany only has 60% Indo-European Haplogroup R and they are considered Indo-European. France has 61.5% Indo-European Haplogroup R and they are considered Indo-European. Poland is 70% Indo-European Haplogroup R and they are considered Indo-European. What makes the Bashkirs different? As has been explained by others, the ancestors to the Proto-Indo-Europeans R1 (including R1a and R1b) did not yet take enough Native European women as conquest spoils of war to make then look white.
The ancestors to the R1a and R1b were R1 and they came out of the mongoloid K2 Family of Haplogroups, with the evidence that they have Mongoloid features in the East, that a tribe more Indo-European than France, Germany and Poland has nearly full mongoloid like the Bashkirs.
The breakdown of what is an Indo-European today is vastly different than what was an Indo-Europeans coming out of Asia thousands of years ago. They were not white.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,608 Given: 1,825 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,922 Given: 18,998 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,608 Given: 1,825 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
Wrong.
Baszkirs have later mongolian and Ugrofinian admix - this is why they llok mongoloidic.
Their neighbours, Udmurts are very white, and are even more redheaded than Scots and Irish together.
Btw, if your theory would be true, then what on earth did do white Tocharians in China?!
Or the white Iranians in Kazakhstan?! They should be even more yellow than Bashkirs. But weren't.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks