Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Iran Sending Warships to Atlantic Ocean Amid Massive New Military Buildup

  1. #21
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Babak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    04-14-2024 @ 09:21 PM
    Location
    United states
    Meta-Ethnicity
    -
    Ethnicity
    Persian-Azeri
    Ancestry
    -
    Country
    Iran
    Taxonomy
    Iranid
    Gender
    Posts
    5,007
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,723
    Given: 5,103

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N1019 View Post
    When the enemy boosts its military, it always rates a mention, even if that enemy is far smaller and weaker.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-i...-idUSKCN1AV0LW

    DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran could abandon its nuclear agreement with world powers "within hours" if the United States imposes any more new sanctions, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said on Tuesday.

    "If America wants to go back to the experience (of imposing sanctions), Iran would certainly return in a short time - not a week or a month but within hours - to conditions more advanced than before the start of negotiations," Rouhani told a session of parliament broadcast live on state television.

    Iran says new U.S. sanctions breach the agreement it reached in 2015 with the United States, Russia, China and three European powers in which it agreed to curb its nuclear work in return for the lifting of most sanctions.

    U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said the new U.S. sanctions were unrelated to the Iran nuclear deal and that Iran must be held responsible for "its missile launches, support for terrorism, disregard for human rights, and violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions."

    "Iran cannot be allowed to use the nuclear deal to hold the world hostage ... The nuclear deal must not become 'too big to fail'," Haley said in a statement on Tuesday, responding to Rouhani.

    Haley will travel to Vienna next week to discuss Iran's nuclear activities with U.N. atomic watchdog officials as part of Washington's review of Tehran's compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal.

    U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres "considers the (Iran nuclear deal) to be one of the utmost diplomatic achievements in our collective search for peace and security," U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric told reporters.

    "We need to do whatever we can to preserve it," Dujarric said.

    The U.S. Treasury imposed sanctions on six Iranian firms in late July for their role in the development of a ballistic missile program after Tehran launched a rocket capable of putting a satellite into orbit.

    In early August, U.S. President Donald Trump signed into law new sanctions on Iran, Russia and North Korea passed by the U.S. Congress. The sanctions in that bill also target Iran's missile programs as well as human rights abuses.

    The United States imposed unilateral sanctions after saying Iran's ballistic missile tests violated a U.N. resolution, which endorsed the nuclear deal and called upon Tehran not to undertake activities related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such technology.

    It stopped short of explicitly barring such activity.

    Iran denies its missile development breaches the resolution, saying its missiles are not designed to carry nuclear weapons.

    "The world has clearly seen that under Trump, America has ignored international agreements and, in addition to undermining the (nuclear deal), has broken its word on the Paris agreement and the Cuba accord ... and that the United States is not a good partner or a reliable negotiator," Rouhani said.

    Trump said last week he did not believe that Iran was living up to the spirit of the nuclear deal.

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Last Online
    09-04-2017 @ 07:46 AM
    Location
    Sydney
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    Australia
    Region
    New South Wales
    Taxonomy
    Who cares?
    Politics
    Non-aligned
    Gender
    Posts
    2,090
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,266
    Given: 1,491

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Babak View Post
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-i...-idUSKCN1AV0LW

    DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran could abandon its nuclear agreement with world powers "within hours" if the United States imposes any more new sanctions, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said on Tuesday.

    "If America wants to go back to the experience (of imposing sanctions), Iran would certainly return in a short time - not a week or a month but within hours - to conditions more advanced than before the start of negotiations," Rouhani told a session of parliament broadcast live on state television.

    Iran says new U.S. sanctions breach the agreement it reached in 2015 with the United States, Russia, China and three European powers in which it agreed to curb its nuclear work in return for the lifting of most sanctions.

    U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said the new U.S. sanctions were unrelated to the Iran nuclear deal and that Iran must be held responsible for "its missile launches, support for terrorism, disregard for human rights, and violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions."

    "Iran cannot be allowed to use the nuclear deal to hold the world hostage ... The nuclear deal must not become 'too big to fail'," Haley said in a statement on Tuesday, responding to Rouhani.

    Haley will travel to Vienna next week to discuss Iran's nuclear activities with U.N. atomic watchdog officials as part of Washington's review of Tehran's compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal.

    U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres "considers the (Iran nuclear deal) to be one of the utmost diplomatic achievements in our collective search for peace and security," U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric told reporters.

    "We need to do whatever we can to preserve it," Dujarric said.

    The U.S. Treasury imposed sanctions on six Iranian firms in late July for their role in the development of a ballistic missile program after Tehran launched a rocket capable of putting a satellite into orbit.

    In early August, U.S. President Donald Trump signed into law new sanctions on Iran, Russia and North Korea passed by the U.S. Congress. The sanctions in that bill also target Iran's missile programs as well as human rights abuses.

    The United States imposed unilateral sanctions after saying Iran's ballistic missile tests violated a U.N. resolution, which endorsed the nuclear deal and called upon Tehran not to undertake activities related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such technology.

    It stopped short of explicitly barring such activity.

    Iran denies its missile development breaches the resolution, saying its missiles are not designed to carry nuclear weapons.

    "The world has clearly seen that under Trump, America has ignored international agreements and, in addition to undermining the (nuclear deal), has broken its word on the Paris agreement and the Cuba accord ... and that the United States is not a good partner or a reliable negotiator," Rouhani said.

    Trump said last week he did not believe that Iran was living up to the spirit of the nuclear deal.
    Hahaha... it's hard to believe.

    As I see it, the Iranians wanted the JCPOA and also know the American play. They know that the Americans want the Iranians to be the ones to "nuke" the deal, because the US could then portray Iran as the bad guy, deserving of punishment, while the US would theoretically come out smelling of roses.

    Either the US will push Iran to formally end the deal, which I find doubtful, or the US will false flag it, producing evidence of some serious offence like secret progress towards nukes, they might blow shit up and blame it on Iran, sink an American ship and blame it on Iran, whatever the deep state decides to do. They're set up for these options.

    Following either outcome, we have H.J. Res 10, ready to go to authorize US military action against Iran.

    Have you seen any mainstream media coverage of H.J. Res 10? I haven't. I've only seen it in very alternative media. I wonder why. Could it be that if more people knew about it, the real plans of the deep state would become obvious?
    Last edited by N1019; 08-16-2017 at 12:40 AM.

  3. #23
    Veteran Member Autrigón's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Last Online
    04-16-2024 @ 11:27 PM
    Ethnicity
    Sexy...too much sexy
    Country
    Micronesia
    Gender
    Posts
    2,146
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,071
    Given: 847

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    WWIII

  4. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Last Online
    09-04-2017 @ 07:46 AM
    Location
    Sydney
    Ethnicity
    European
    Country
    Australia
    Region
    New South Wales
    Taxonomy
    Who cares?
    Politics
    Non-aligned
    Gender
    Posts
    2,090
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,266
    Given: 1,491

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Autrigón View Post
    WWIII
    Russia doesn't love Iran enough to directly fight America over. Russia and Iran do not have a mutual defence pact and probably never will, because it would be too dangerous for Russia to enter into such an arrangement. It would be more like another Syria/Iraq, but I concede that the conflict could lead elsewhere, into something bigger.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-09-2016, 08:31 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-14-2013, 04:33 AM
  3. Israel's sub fleet buildup will cost $1.8B
    By microrobert in forum Deutschland - English Entries
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-15-2012, 08:15 PM
  4. USS Enterprise heads to the Gulf amid Iran tensions
    By poiuytrewq0987 in forum News Articles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-22-2012, 07:52 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-07-2011, 10:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •