Gedrosian Admixture as in Pakistanis

[Gangrel]

28 is too high . I wil run kurdissh kits later when i am on computer . I have 23

You are part turk tho

[Mingle]

Where did Gedrosia come from? Central hunter gatherers? It looks like it's non-existent in Baltic and Poles/Ukrainians, peaks in Dinaric alps in the Balkans, and British isles in Europe.

Most likely Balochistan if I'm not mistaken.

[Hadouken]

You are part turk tho

if i am partilly turkish then only 1/3 .i am mostly kurdish either way. and turks score 13 14 or so percent themselves. I will look for kurdish results later and also run kits of other west asians

[Kouros]

we wuz schyrhianz

?

Most likely Balochistan if I'm not mistaken.

Is it related to a specific ancient/pre-historic people? I find it weird how the only place you don't find it is in Slavs.

[Hadouken]

if i am partilly turkish then only 1/3 .i am mostly kurdish either way. and turks score 13 14 or so percent themselves. I will look for kurdish results later and also run kits of other west asians

ok as promised I run several people through the calc :

Georgians :

20.49

18.49

20.61

18.80


Kurds from Tunceli/Dersim - Turkey


23.29 (my score)

22.71

24.58




Armenians :

19.27

20.28


Feyli Kurd from Iran :

27.26


Laz from Rize - Turkey :

16.51

[Jana]

There is an interesting mystery.. Has it been solved?

The relative high amount of Gedrosian in British Isles people.

It follows a broken path.. I mean it s reasonable that Gedrosian entered Europe from south east.. But then it s disconnected because Balkans and Central europe have less Gedrosian than the British isles.

Why is that?.. Historic mating of British with Indians and Pakistanis?

I think map is somewhat incorrect for south-central Europe (it shows it lower than reality). Both me and Stears score around 6% Gedrosian admix. I think it is usual for this part of Europe.

[princeton90]

1) Only Baloch people are around 60% Gedrosian and Baloch are only 2% of Pakistani population.
2) No, you cannot call proto-Gedrosians look like Baloch people since it would be really inaccurate. There would be a HUGE genetic distance between an average Baloch and a person who is hypothetically 100% Gedrosian by DNA. Because of that huge genetic distance, they would probably look very different from each other.

[Zoro]

Everyone knows it makes no sense that Northern Europeans or for that matter any Europeans to score that much Gedrosian or Baloch component according to Dodecad K12b Gedmatch calculator above in the map

If you want to get more accurate admixture percentages you should use GedrosiaDNA project calculators not Dodecad or Eurogenes. The only bad thing about GedrosiaDNA calculators is that the oracles don’t have enough populations so you get modelled according to the few populations that are in the oracles.

Otherwise GedrosiaDNA calculators at GEDmatch have more accurate admixture percentages generally than Dodecad, Eurogenes or others. Here’s the proof:

As we can see in this chart the GedrosiaDNA Gedrosia or Baloch percentages make much more sense to everyone than the map of Dodecad K12 Gedrosia percentages above because Europeans score almost 0. Same with East Asians, Africans and Siberians. Also Indians except NW Indians score much less than Iranics such as Kurds which of course akso makes better sense than the other GEDmatch calculators

Chart is according to Gedrosia K12 population average spreadsheet on GEDmatch

[IMG][/IMG]

[Grace O'Malley]

This is an old component from a calculator that is nearly 10 years old. It's not based on ancient components so pretty much outdated now.

[Zoro]

This is an old component from a calculator that is nearly 10 years old. It's not based on ancient components so pretty much outdated now.

Yeah so is the GedrosiaDNA K12 but that’s not a valid excuse since the Gedrosia K12 Gedrosia percentages makes much more sense than the Dodecad K12