Latest DNA study show that Myceneans and Minoans were Neolithic and non Indoeuropeans

[DarknessWin]

Well said professor

Get the fuck out of here

[DarknessWin]

And they were Greeks who in turn are Indo-Europeans themselves.

They were europeans, not indoeuropeans.

Indoeuropeans are people came from Afganistan,Kyrgystan and north India and today settle in north east europe

[Kamal900]

They were europeans, not indoeuropeans.

Indoeuropeans are people came from Afganistan,Kyrgystan and north India and today settle in north east europe

Dude, it's the other way around. Indo-Europeans came from North-Eastern Europe, and Greeks themselves are Indo-Europeans regardless on the fact that they don't have much steppe ancestry themselves, and they're mostly derived from pre-indo-European native peoples of South-Eastern Europe.

[DarknessWin]

Dude, it's the other way around. Indo-Europeans came from North-Eastern Europe, and Greeks themselves are Indo-Europeans regardless on the fact that they don't have much steppe ancestry themselves, and they're mostly derived from pre-indo-European native peoples of South-Eastern Europe.

How do you know that??
The most R1a exist in Afganistan Pashtuns ,Pakistan and North India

Indoeuropeans are not native to Europe

[Babak]

How do you know that??
The most R1a exist in Afganistan Pashtuns ,Pakistan and North India

Indoeuropeans are not native to Europe

Yea but all those groups have steppe-admix

[DarknessWin]

Yea but all those groups have steppe-admix

They have not steppe admix, they are 100% middle east

[Coolguy1]

I dont understand the point of this thread. Indo-European is a linguistic category, which Greek falls under. The Mycenaeans were the first inhabitants in Greece to speak the Greek language, making them Indo-Europeans. We dont know what language the Minoans spoke, but it seems plausible that it was a linguistic isolate, similar to Basque today. The two groups however, despite their linguistic differences, are similar in genetic composition, the difference being higher amounts of steppe ancestry in the Mycenaeans.

There really isn't much more to it.

[Fantomas]

I dont understand the point of this thread. Indo-European is a linguistic category, which Greek falls under. The Mycenaeans were the first inhabitants in Greece to speak the Greek language, making them Indo-Europeans. We dont know what language the Minoans spoke, but it seems plausible that it was a linguistic isolate, similar to Basque today. The two groups however, despite their linguistic differences, are similar in genetic composition, the difference being higher amounts of steppe ancestry in the Mycenaeans.

There really isn't much more to it.

It's interesting, how long some people going to keep believing in absolutely groundless "steppe urheimat" indo-European theory?

I guess this phenomenon or form of mass insanity directly has to do with aggressive unalternative points of view which have been imposed with very obsessive style, like Eupedia did it for example.

[kingjohn]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4JPMYHTZis

this for rethel

[kingjohn]

myceneans were indo european
they had significant steppe admixture

Mycenaean
Minoan_Lasithi 0.786±0.049
Sintashta 0.214±0.049
P-value 0.96574059
chisq 6.030
Full output

Mycenaean
Corded_Ware_Germany 0.210±0.043
Minoan_Lasithi 0.790±0.043
P-value 0.961238695
chisq 6.198
Full output

Mycenaean
Minoan_Lasithi 0.791±0.043
Srubnaya 0.209±0.043
P-value 0.950419642
chisq 6.558
Full output


http://eurogenes.blogspot.co.il/2017...ycenaeans.html

regards
adam