1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,201 Given: 9,778 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,158 Given: 4,510 |
Cheap semantics & dodging the question. Bombing Gaddafi's forces and supplying the rebels.
Besides, controlling the air-space is a form of invasion.
Anyway, let's hear it? Why can the U.S. do this but when Russia liberates ethnic Russians in Crimea suddenly they're the bad guy?
Fuck U.S. foreign policy so bad, this makes me blow steam from my ears. I hate hypocrites more than anything.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,201 Given: 9,778 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,956 Given: 11,667 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,158 Given: 4,510 |
hurr durr durr, Etain logic:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.02530e16a498Asked an open-ended question about where respondents considered their “homeland” to be, Crimeans, unlike easterners or other southerners, showed fairly little affiliation with the Ukrainian state.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapo.../#c1a61fb510dbWhen asked “Do you endorse Russia’s annexation of Crimea?”, a total of 82% of the respondents answered “yes, definitely,” and another 11% answered “yes, for the most part.” Only 2% said they didn't know, and another 2% said no. Three percent did not specify their position.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,201 Given: 9,778 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,435 Given: 793 |
American/english supplies played negligible role, no matter if it is 4% or whole 7% as quoted in OP "historian" claims. Large part of these supplies was of inferior quality (tanks for example). And supplies started arriving when Hitlers plans of fast victory failed, thus he already lost the war. Overreseptantion of supplied materials in certain areas can be explained very easily. Having this covered by allies, soviet industry could have focused on something else.
For example, you buy half of your food in shop A. Does it mean if shop A gets closed your rations would get halved? No it does not, because you would buy more food in shop B. Or if someone covers 5% of your bills, does it mean you can not fully pay for yourself?
If you were not that dumb you would focused on more noticable american/british contribution to the victory. Bombing Germoney to the ground, destroying industrial facilities, killing civilians etc. But then again, it came to action too late, when war's outcome was already decided.
PS: No matter who exactly invaded Lybia, US directly or its minions. All shitstorms in Middle EAst is a result of US interference in the region. And no amount of CIA payed trolls pretending to be happy lybians would change that.
Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,088 Given: 3,785 |
Don't be an idiot. There are no friends in international politics unless it's formally confirmed by agreements. And USSR had no agreements of alliance with any of Western powers. UK had alliance with Poland hence the reasons behind declaration of war on Germany. They were simply obliged to do so.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks