Soviet Union didn't singlehandedly win WWII: Lend Lease

[Dragoon]

US gave stuff to both Nazis and Soviets (at different time periods).

However, the Soviets did majority of the work to win in Europe. Sadly they also did crimes (thats why many people dont like them).

[deutschen Blutes]

USA didn't support Nazi. It is supposed that you have read this thread. There are plenty of evidences of the USA support for Soviet Union. Your problem is that you talk from the perspective of someone who live in XXI century. Also you ignore the dialectic of the events.

Parts of the American population did support the Nazis. The German American Bund being a good example. American racial policies also influenced Nazi racial theories. Henry Ford and Madison Grant both played a role in Nazism.

However, the Soviets did majority of the work to win in Europe. Sadly they also did crimes (thats why many people dont like them).

The crimes committed by various communist regimes such as the Soviet Union ("Stalinism era") and the History of the People's Republic of China (1949–76) ("Mao's era").

Stalin's and Mao Zedong's crimes are nowhere near in the news as much as Hitler's crimes. I bet not a lot of British people have even heard of the genocide during Stalin's Holodomor and Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution. Yet, everyone has heard about Hitler's Holocaust.

[War Chef]

What a BULL SHIT (video).

* Russians attacked Finland already 30th of October 1939 (Winter war).

* Finland was never occupied by Alliance forces (= Russians here).

* Finns never reached to St. Petersburg (like video's map gives idea...keeping minds Siege of Leningrad).

=> Typical Russians half true information.

1. The animation was made to show furthest extent of German penetration into Russia, which is more or less accurate (they were stopped before being able to see the Caucasus with the eye) nevermind Finland.

2. Where do you see them reaching Leningrad (St. Petersburg)? It's showing Finnish advance into Karelia during continuation war.



I like Finland so I'll stay out of your bait.

[Sacrificed Ram]

The crimes committed by various communist regimes such as the Soviet Union ("Stalinism era") and the History of the People's Republic of China (1949–76) ("Mao's era").

Stalin's and Mao Zedong's crimes are nowhere near in the news as much as Hitler's crimes. I bet not a lot of British people have even heard of the genocide during Stalin's Holodomor and Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution. Yet, everyone has heard about Hitler's Holocaust.

Please, also talk about the crimes of dictadorships in west and the 100 millions of people died in India during XX century.

[Laberia]

Parts of the American population did support the Nazis. The German American Bund being a good example. American racial policies also influenced Nazi racial theories. Henry Ford and Madison Grant both played a role in Nazism.



The crimes committed by various communist regimes such as the Soviet Union ("Stalinism era") and the History of the People's Republic of China (1949–76) ("Mao's era").

Stalin's and Mao Zedong's crimes are nowhere near in the news as much as Hitler's crimes. I bet not a lot of British people have even heard of the genocide during Stalin's Holodomor and Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution. Yet, everyone has heard about Hitler's Holocaust.

Parts of population is one thing and the foreign policy is another. Even in GB, there were many people who had sympathy for the Nazis.

[Laberia]

Please, also talk about the crimes of dictadorships in west and the 100 millions of people died in India during XX century.

Communists committed genocide against their people.

[Profileid]

American/english supplies played negligible role, no matter if it is 4% or whole 7% as quoted in OP "historian" claims. Large part of these supplies was of inferior quality (tanks for example). And supplies started arriving when Hitlers plans of fast victory failed, thus he already lost the war. Overreseptantion of supplied materials in certain areas can be explained very easily. Having this covered by allies, soviet industry could have focused on something else.
For example, you buy half of your food in shop A. Does it mean if shop A gets closed your rations would get halved? No it does not, because you would buy more food in shop B. Or if someone covers 5% of your bills, does it mean you can not fully pay for yourself?
If you were not that dumb you would focused on more noticable american/british contribution to the victory. Bombing Germoney to the ground, destroying industrial facilities, killing civilians etc. But then again, it came to action too late, when war's outcome was already decided.

If they played a negligible role, why did Zukhov boast about how helpful it was to the war effort? Do you know more than he did?

PS: No matter who exactly invaded Lybia, US directly or its minions. All shitstorms in Middle EAst is a result of US interference in the region. And no amount of CIA payed trolls pretending to be happy lybians would change that.

how are these people I know personally paid trolls? By all means,talk to Libyans yourself.

[Sacrificed Ram]

Communists committed genocide against their people.

When a child die of famine in a communist country, the blame is of communism.

When a child die of famine in a capitalist country, this is a death by natural causes.

Open your eyes! If you are preocupated with genocide, see the 70 millions of abortions of innocent children in USA!

[Profileid]

"Without American production the United Nations could never have won the war"

http://content.time.com/time/magazin...797691,00.html
From your hero Stalin.

[ЛыSSый]

One more thread, which is full of pure anti-russian butthurt and stupied attempts to re-write history. Sure, my children will read thread "Russia didn't singlehandedly win WWIII: Lend Lease from China"