0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,686 Given: 9,316 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,023 Given: 2,190 |
Sure...but other slavics.
I still someway agree...as Russians (country/leaders/nation) have never much valued even their own country's individual humans/persons...except if those can be used to support some of their political agendas/targets.
Not sure about Lenin & Trotzky...but atleast Stalin's Sovjet Union was already quite far from that German Jew's ideas?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 17,773 Given: 1,799 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,268 Given: 1,561 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,686 Given: 9,316 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
A comparison of several minorities in Russia in 1795 and in 2002:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4647915
Year 2002 /// Year 1795
Total population - 145,166,731 /// 42,699,500
Tatars - 5,554,601 /// 796,000
Bashkirs - 1,673,389 /// 191,600
Chuvashes - 1,637,094 /// 351,800
Mordvins - 843,350 /// 345,500
Maris - 604,298 /// 145,200
Karelians - 93,344 /// 143,500
Udmurts - 636,906 /// 134,900
Kalmyks - 173,996 /// 88,100
Komis - 432,248 /// 52,400
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,098 Given: 47 |
Russia is about 85% Slavic, so I do not see a reason why it should not be called Slavic.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks