How Finns became less Asian due to Indo-Europeans

[Stears]

Khanty and Mansi folks are the original Uralics.

Wrong. They are heavily mixed with aboriginal Siberians, because after the Russian conquest they were forced to leave their homeland.

Finno-Ugric tribes are originally white people, unlike swarthy IE Gypsies.

[Stears]

Wrong! There are three Indo-European populations lighter than Finns:

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4309286

Also Estonians - who are more IE than Finns - are lighter than Finns:





The blondest of Finnic groups are Estonians, but they are similar genetically to Balts.

There is also a PCA graph of Ugro-Finnic populations based on MDLP K23b:

As you can see, of all Ugro-Finns, the most similar to Balts (Latvians) are Estonians:

https://antropologia-fizyczna.pl/ima...nowie/k23b.jpg

Bullashit. Specific region is not ethnic group. The Estonians are not indoeuropeans.

Indo Europeans are darker, deal with it.

[Stears]

Here are your Aryan indo-european brothers

[Fractal]

Lol you Slavs are just butthurt because we don't want to have nothing to do with your shit-race.

These Slavs (as well as Iranids and even new world whites like Magnus) also try to connect themselves with the Vedic culture of Ancient India.

[Harkonnen]

These Slavs (as well as Iranids and even new world whites like Magnus) also try to connect themselves with the Vedic culture of Ancient India.

They are just jelly because Indian culture is superior to the pathetic Slavs. I know a few Indians and they are the most honest good guys I know. I would never trust aSlav. They are natural born criminals and backstabbers.

[Finnish Swede]

Agree....those statistics are mainly BS. And what comes to Latvians...are one now comparing ''Livonians'' vs Estonians? Same would be to take 2 persons from Pärnu and check them.

Still...again...if Indo-Europeans influence (what ever...making Finns less ''mongoloids'', lighter or even more blonds) would have been someway important...then R1 haplogroups should be much more common in Finland.

[Ülev]

These Slavs (as well as Iranids and even new world whites like Magnus) also try to connect themselves with the Vedic culture of Ancient India.

right man, they (R1) are local Indians which came once to Europe looking for their Aryan J y-dna masters

Poles use sanskrit and even do not realise that, other Slavs have only 20% common vocabulary with polish language

all Slavs laugh at polish "prze"/"pshe", but no one knows from where it comes

polish word for excuse me / sorry is przepraszam - pshe prasham

polish word pshe/prze means great, bigger

sanskrit word prasham --> http://www.indiachildnames.com/name.aspx?name=Prasham
Name Prasham generally means Peace, is of Indian origin, Name Prasham is a Masculine (or Boy) name. Person with name Prasham are mainly Hindu by religion. Name Prasham belongs to rashi Kanya (Virgo) .
and what should do person after quarell etc? - should try to make bigger/greater peace - pshe + prasham = psheprasham / przepraszam


so please take your R1ethelians back to India, Slavic (Indo-European) language is local Indian language like Sanskrit, the locals wrote everything in their own language, not in the master's language

[Harkonnen]

This is the real genetic reality



Slavs are genetically closer to Mari than Finns are, because Finns have retained Uralic genes better than Volga Finno-Ugrians. If there is Indio-European ancestry in Uralics it is mainly found those froups from Volga. Finns don't have it.

[Peterski]

Here are your Aryan indo-european brothers

Here is my IE brother, notice how he scores Corded Ware and Scandinavian admixtures. He is 100% Afghan Pashtun. This European admixture is due to ancient Indo-European migrations:

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4515352



https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4583967

[cosmoo]

They were always racially associated with IE. Just two versions of same steppe thugs.
News of the racial position of these early Finnish skulls will come as a surprise to scholars who see in the Finns a group of mongoloid immigrants from Asia. But that they were essentially if not wholly European is, despite the paucity of Debetz's material, incontestable. Nor can one derive these Finns from forest-dwellers of Mesolithic tradition, except perhaps as a minor influence. Furthermore, in the early Anan'ino series, recognizable Corded peculiarities are to he found in but one male skull out of seven. The Finno-Ugrians, therefore, may be tentatively considered to have been, in the period before they expanded into their historic scats, Europeans of mixed origin, basically Danubian in type, with some brachycephalic ele ment and an extremely long-headed variation as well; the latter is already familiar to us in the form of the Corded type; the former is not clearly definable, but is European. Its only discernible difference from the others in the same series is in a greater breadth of the skull. This broad-headed element is completely lacking in the late lower Volga group, of which we have only the cranial indices.

Debetz's discovery that the Finno-Ugrian speakers were originally purely European in race, and furthermore, not local Palaeolithic or Mesolithic survivors, is in perfect accord with the present state of linguistic knowledge, which makes their form of speech one of two equally weighted elements in the basic Indo-European.