Thread: countries who surprise you as being rich and the ones who surprise you as being poor.

[Jehan]

Rich:

Finland: Isolate position. Bad climat. Not fertil land. No natural ressource. Bad geopolitical position (near Russia / CCCR). Still they acheive to be one of the most develop nation.

Iceland A bit the same. A middle of nowhere, but the acheive succeess.



Poor

Algeria Tons of natural ressource, fertil land, good climat, near mediteranean sea a bonus for tourism. And they fail.



For me that's just show an evidence. A lot of factors will influence the wealth of a nation. But at the end the quality of the population will play a key role.

[Peterski]

Ukraine really surprises me as being corrupted, poor and dysfunctional.

What is the worst thing, the war is fought in their most productive region:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Donbass

https://s29.postimg.org/3ryzctppx/Ukraine_GDP.png



https://s18.postimg.org/ghknwu3xl/Ukraine.png



Before 1991 Ukraine was quite functional and rich for Communist standards.

Maybe some nations are really naturally better off under Communism ???

[Peterski]

^^^
Here is what Dmowski wrote in 1930 about Ukraine and why it cannot be a functional nation:

"Roman Dmowski on The Ukraine Question" (part 1):

http://www.theimaginativeconservativ...1930-part.html

"Roman Dmowski on The Ukraine Question" (part 2):

http://www.theimaginativeconservativ...30-part-2.html