People mistake christian compassion

[ioan assen]

Christianity is about love and life the right way.
Gay culture is a 50%'er. It has love but no life.
If this world was full of gays then gods creations would disappear and so would human life.
This is the only reason the mother church is against homosexualism - its deviancy and it is anti-life.

But the church is not against marring straight people who can not have kids. Those couples don't bring life through their love. And gays can have children - via a sexual contact with a member of the other sex/surrogate mother/insemination for lesbians. They can also adopt which is much more preferable to leaving the children in orphanages.

[catgeorge]

But the church is not against marring straight people who can not have kids. Those couples don't bring life through their love. And gays can have children - via a sexual contact with a member of the other sex/surrogate mother/insemination for lesbians. They can also adopt which is much more preferable to leaving the children in orphanages.

Of course the church is not against the unfortunate and need to be supported - even by scientific means. A child growing up in a household with a mother and father figure is healthy for the child. But now we are delving in Platos Republic and Aristotles work of being indoctrinated with excellence.

Plato, Aristotle and mother church is against homosexualism - and I don't have the energy to argue against them.

For those who believe in paradigm shifts. 4.000 year old institutions takes precedence over the current 25 year gay culture to my eyes.

[ioan assen]

Of course the church is not against the unfortunate and need to be supported - even by scientific means. A child growing up in a household with a mother and father figure is healthy for the child. But now we are delving in Platos Republic and Aristotles work of being indoctrinated with excellence.

The science is clear: Children raised by same-sex parents are at no disadvantage - https://qz.com/438469/the-science-is...-disadvantage/

Plato, Aristotle and mother church is against homosexualism - and I don't have the energy to argue against them.

Plato, in the Symposium, argues for an army to be comprised of same-sex lovers. Plato clearly sees same-sex passions as especially strong, and hence particularly problematic, although in the Symposium that erotic attraction could be the catalyst for a life of philosophy, rather than base sensuality. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/homosexuality/ I think as a whole he was pro and against depending on when you ask him, haha

For those who believe in paradigm shifts. 4.000 year old institutions takes precedence over the current 25 year gay culture to my eyes.

And which institution survived 4000 years? And why is present-day culture "gay" when gays are under 10 percent of the population (at least officially)?

[catgeorge]

Ok this is nonsense now in particular where one has never read the republic and never quoted homosexualism in any of his works. Plato practiced the basic tenets of physiognomics. I do not wish to carry on. These are concepts taken by Rome lock stock and barrell.