0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,720 Given: 43,625 |
Zodiac signs mean little if you do not know planetary positions and relationships. somebody can be eg. aries but have much stronger eg. leo or any other influences in his natal chart. most people are too superifical to understand laws of astrology.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,951 Given: 5,518 |
I believe in Natal Chart.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,667 Given: 5,726 |
No, not at all.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,951 Given: 5,518 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 728 Given: 861 |
Actually someone added the elements in that image, what Hippocrates, a physician, originally proposed, was 4 different body fluids that would influence the humours (because supposedly some people would have more of one specific fluid than the other fluids in the body), so no, that doesn't have anything to do with zodiac signs.
"Moderation in all things healthful; total abstinence from all things harmful."
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,951 Given: 5,518 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,673 Given: 1,433 |
Nope. If someone can actually present an explanation as to why zodiac signs are of any importance, I would genuinely be willing to listen, no judgement here. But I've said this for years and nobody's ever been able to say anything beyond "this vague description somewhat resembles my personality so therefore it must be true", so I remain unconvinced.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,346 Given: 1,328 |
No, but I like to laugh at those who do, so I pretend I'm interested.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks