Post your FTDNA results

[Leto]

Here's my results. Would be good if they could divide up the British Isles component like other calculators do, but overall It's probably quite accurate.

2% Iberia or West and Central Europe would make much more sense in your case than Southeast Europe.

[Peterski]

2% Iberia or West and Central Europe would make much more sense in your case than Southeast Europe.

Southeast Europe includes Italy. So this is Roman admixture.

[Erronkari]

[Albannach]

2% Iberia or West and Central Europe would make much more sense in your case than Southeast Europe.

Maybe but I have noticed on family finder and Myheritige that I have about five Bulgarian matches.

[Albannach]

Southeast Europe includes Italy. So this is Roman admixture.

Come on now Litvin we all know Scotland was the only country in the world the MIGHTY Romans tried to conquer and failed, Hadrians wall was a pretty huge cockblock.

[Leto]

...

In your case it should be South America. Anyway, an impressive Iberian percentage. How much Iberian do fully Spanish people usually score on FTDNA?

[Erronkari]

In your case it should be South America. Anyway, an impressive Iberian percentage. How much Iberian do fully Spanish people usually score on FTDNA?

Yes, it's crazy... my native must be South America, but unhappily DNA tests still have some problems to recognize different ethnic groups...
Talking about the Iberian, I saw that many spaniards and portuguese people score an important % of northwestern european, british and central european, but I've seen some of them who score more than 90% Iberian too.
Who score more Iberian % many times are basques, indeed I have an important amount of basque ancestry, also some french-basque, but FTDNA consider all basques in the Iberian spectrum.

[Rethel]

Come on now Litvin we all know Scotland was the only country in the world the MIGHTY Romans tried to conquer and failed, Hadrians wall was a pretty huge cockblock.

There was no Scotland man, when Romans ruled in Britain... there was no even Scots - they were still in Hibernia...

[Albannach]

There was no Scotland man, when Romans ruled in Britain... there was no even Scots - they were still in Hibernia...

Calm down mate it was only a joke. But you could substitute Caledonia for Scotland as Hadrians wall marks the extent of both.

Scottish people are an amalgamation of numerous groups of different peoples, Britons, Gaels, Angles, Picts, Vikings, Normans. We are not of purely Irish descent and my Y-Dna is Caledonian/Pictish which proves that point, so obviously my direct male line were in Scotland/Caledonia during Roman times

[Rethel]

Scottish people are an amalgamation of numerous groups of different peoples, Britons, Gaels, Angles, Picts, Vikings, Normans. We are not of purely Irish descent and my Y-Dna is Caledonian/Pictish which proves that point, so obviously my direct male line were in Scotland/Caledonia during Roman times

Doesn;t matter, as they were not Scotts, and assimieted folk is not original Scottish either.

It was Caledonia, inhabited by two different folks, which members
probably live until today there. But they were not Scots. Saying
otherwise in your example, is like saying, that Vikings couldn't
conquer Yankees of Canadians.