5
A lot of Idiots keep claiming South Asians are not Caucasoid. Firstable South Asians are a mix of West Eurasian + ASI components. Firstable the first Caucasoid properly didn't exist in Europe.
1) The ASI component in South Asians is not necessarily Australoid, many claims it's a proto-Caucasoid. Also ASI it's closer to West Eurasian than to East Asian and Sub-Saharan DNA.
2) ASI which is predominant in South India are all anthropologically different from the Australoid Negrito and Australian aborigines that resemble Africans not to mention Australoid have many different variations not just a African-look alike type but others like Caucasoid.
Where is your pure Caucasoid genetically. There is none, if if they are 99.98% West Eurasian genetically it doesn't make you pure. So what's a pure Caucasoid?
Caucasoid is a anthropologically type not a genetic type.
GENETICALLY ? use your brain before you keep talking shit.
There is no such thing as pure Caucasoid genetically only anthropologically. And anthropologically South Asians are pure Caucasoids like Europeans, Middle easterners.
Please use your brain before you make wrong judgments
North Africans are CAUCASOID anthropologically but they are genetically admixtures of mix of West Eurasian and SSA ( Black African / Sub-Saharan) which is Negroid type
Central Asian/Turks are CAUCASOID anthropologically but they are genetically mix of West Eurasian and East Eurasian ( East Asian / Siberian ) which is Mongoloid type
North African DNA
Central Asian Turk DNA
East Asian DNA distribution
African DNA distribution
Bookmarks