0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,848 Given: 2,744 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,258 Given: 3,510 |
no population returned, the natives we are talking about is the popuation that remained, whose descendants were these 97,000 before venetian dominance
it's obviously very simple, and that's what sources support, and what studies confirm
And remember, the study rejects the "slavic and anatolian ancestry" of peloponnesians, ancestry of non-peloponnesian Greek populations is not disputed, even though it's smaller than native
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,848 Given: 2,744 |
I didn't said that the entire population migrated. I said that in one occasion, 60% of the population was replaced by other people arrived from other regions. But this is not the only replacement of the population of Peninsula in 1.400 years of history. There are other migration. For this reason people who live today in the region has nothing to do with the people who lived 1.400 years ago.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,258 Given: 3,510 |
no source is talking about 60% population replacement, that's what you understood.
Prewar population was 200.000, post-war population was 97,000 in 1691, when venetians finally dominated the region, and 1700's population was 176,000. that means 40% of the population were descendants of replaced people. The majority were still descendants of prewar
And yes, this is the only important population replacemenet recorded for the particular region, often with peloponnesian originated people themselves living in other regions
And common logic says that population increase is can be caused by high birth rates too, not only by immigrations
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,848 Given: 2,744 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,258 Given: 3,510 |
more than an hour and you still can't understand that according to simple maths, there was no 60% population replacement
1700's population=176000- native post-war population that remained(97000)=79000, 79000 people colonized the region, making up 40% of prewar population, not 60%
Do you suffer from dyscalculia?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,848 Given: 2,744 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,258 Given: 3,510 |
Even if we estimate the 86000 of 1688, which according to sources 3 years later increase to 97000 obviously due to corinthian inclusion (who were not included in 1688) and natural population increase by births, it's still like 50%, far from 60% or more that you claim (and as I said, considering these 87000 is pointless, as a whole region is not included, in fact they were many more than 97000 as mani is never included)
dude we are talking about deep dyscalculian disorder of you
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,258 Given: 3,510 |
Talking about peloponnese and central Greece, the last "massive" foreign immigration was this of Ionian islanders and cretans after 1833
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks