0
My final conclusion is ANE is Mongoloid in East Asian/Siberia/Southeast Asia and Caucasoid in Europe/Middle east/South Asia. I HOPE WE CAN ALL AGREE.
This ANE dna was really the worst piece of crap confusion I've ever witnessed in my life and that that includes the genetic study of Malt'a boy. I wouldn't be surprised that this was all part of the Zionist plan to drive people insane.
Why ANE is also Mongoloid ( for three good reasons )
No.1)
ANE ADMIXTURE
" A people similar to MA-1 were important genetic contributors to Native Americans, Europeans, Central and South Asians, and minor contribution to East Eurasians. [10] Lazaridis et al. (2016) notes "a cline of ANE ancestry across the east-west extent of Eurasia."[11] According to a 2016 study, it was found that the global maximum of ANE ancestry occurs in modern-day Kets, Mansi, Native Americans, Nganasans and Yukaghirs.[3] " <--------- All these populations are pure Mongoloid and predominant Mongoloid
ANE admixture in Ngannasans was 28%
As we can all see Ngannasans all samples show 100% East Asian admixture with exception of 2 European admixture and that's only 0.1% and 0.5% which means there is no freaking way it was due ANE since this admixture reaches one of the highest percentages in Ngannasans. The Yukaghirs also showed 100% PURE DNA, unlike the Kets and Mansi who also show predominant Mongoloid DNA but are mixed.
No.2
Oroqen people have 9.24% ANE but DNA always shows 100% East Asian/Siberian admixture the same goes for Daur with over 7% ANE
Oroqen have one of the highest Siberian component in East Asia a DNA that reaches 40-60% in Mongolian 30-55% in Koreans. In this study West Mongolians who have different degree of Turkic ancestry shows west Eurasian admixture, it makes sense when there are several Turkic ethnic group residing there and many are Mongolianized Turks but they make up only 1/10 of the population
No.3
I made some previous explanations. I can quickly see why ANE isn't Caucasoid only when I analyzed it. Like I said previously
* Northern African Caucasoid from Southern Algeria, Libya have 0% ANE
* Saudi Arabians Caucasoids from the central have it lower than Chinese, Burmese, Nivkhs
* East Africans Entreans, Sudanese Arabs have 30-70% Caucasoid admixture but 0% ANE
* Central North Africans have 20-45% West Eurasian admixture but 0% ANE
* It's highest in Selkups, Kets are a clearly mixed race but they also have admixture the Russian and Slavic immigrants
* Filipinos have 0% ANE admixture while other Southeast Asian have it much higher ?????? [/B]
* The only Southeast Asians who claim European ancestry are Filipino
* I mean we all freaking know any European admixture in Filipinos come from the Spaniards and South American, the Spaniards have it significantly so how come the Filipino have none of this DNA
It makes no freaking sense that Filipino have 0% ANE dna despite their genetic makeup of 5% Southern European admixture, 2% Native American, 3% Southern Asia
5% Southern Europeans
3% Southern Asians
2% Native American
= 0% ANE admixture ?
Chinese ? everytime I see of them always shown 0% West Eurasian admixture except when they have ANE
Chinese and Vietnamese shows 2.3 to 4.5% when they both have 100% East Asian/Southeast Asian pure Mongoloid DNA while some Han Chinese even show 6-10%
43% Southeast Asian
57% Northeast Asian
Bookmarks