Zimbabwe

[Aldaris]

BTW Bostwanna is a model African economy, all other African countries should mimic it.

You're correct that Botswana has a pretty decent and stable governance (for example their corruption rate is on the level of Israel or Poland, which is pretty good for an African country), but there are some other factors aswell. It is a pretty large country with low population density and not so many ethnic divisions (which means there are fewer opportunities for internal ethnic conflicts) with a huge diamond industry, the largest in the world in fact. They've been really, really lucky the British didn't discover the diamonds, when Botswana was their colony.

[Blondie]

Africa should be re-colonized.

No, this stupid colonization is the main reason why West Europe is so multicultural, they can get citizenship very easly because of colonization. Black africans have rights to freedom, we must leave them alone for example don't give them money, technology etc. This is their continent and Europe for europeans.

[Rumata]

Also, if Russians did not have such vast mineral resources and wealth, their GDP would be just as terrible as Ukraine if not worse. Russians = Ukrainians with land.

By this logic Belarussians should be even worse off. Yet, they aren't.

Also, Ukrainian land is very fruitful compared to Russian average. On par with Dobruja I suppose.

[Smeagol]

No, this stupid colonization is the main reason why West Europe is so multicultural, they can get citizenship very easly because of colonization.

That's not because of colonization but because of traitors taking power in European governments.

Black africans have rights to freedom, we must leave them alone for example don't give them money, technology etc. This is their continent and Europe for europeans.

Black Africans can't be trusted to run any countries anywhere.

[Blondie]

That's not because of colonization but because of traitors taking power in European governments.



Black Africans can't be trusted to run any countries anywhere.

The colonization is serious reason and you have no right to colonize others, to steal their resources etc. If you agree with colonization, why don't you like when latinos are going to colonize USA? There's a double standard here.

[Ülev]

[Smeagol]

The colonization is serious reason and you have no right to colonize others, to steal their resources etc. If you agree with colonization, why don't you like when latinos are going to colonize USA? There's a double standard here.

Spics aren't colonizing anything. They're walking into the country and our leaders refuse to take any action to stop them. Might makes right, but neither the spics coming into America or the rapefugees entering Europe have any real might. They aren't conquerors like our ancestors. They would stand no chance in an actual war.

[Blondie]

Spics aren't colonizing anything. They're walking into the country and our leaders refuse to take any action to stop them. Might makes right, but neither the spics coming into America or the rapefugees entering Europe have any real might. They aren't conquerors like our ancestors. They would stand no chance in an actual war.

They are conquerors but in other way.

[Smeagol]

They are conquerors but in other way.

They aren't. They don't conquer anyone.

[War Chef]

They are conquerors but in other way.

They are the indigenous pre-columbian owners of the land taking back what's theirs, yes. Most Hispanics are predominately Amerindian.