Persian Empire of Barbarian Scum, Owned And Dominated By Superior Greece

[MagnusAurelius]

The Persians were advanced Ancient Barbarians, not as pathetic and primitive as Germanic tribes or pathetic in terms of archiecture/living conditions like Celtic tribes but they were Barbaric in terms of mentality. It is well known the Persians worship their leaders like Gods, idolize them, they still do this today. Arrogant Persian Empire was demolished by the superior Greeks, their Heavy infantry Immortals, no match for superior imposing Greek Hoplites with big Bronze shields, bigger cocks and imposing helmuts.

https://i.imgur.com/VBoC8fC.jpg To this day Greek men have bigger cocks and are taller on average than Persians. The Iranian figure is "self reported" but I believe it, Iraanian men are known for having bigger cocks than their pathetic counter parts the Vedic people of shit hole India, the smallest, weakest , most dominated and owned mixed Caucasoids on earth, South Asia=dump of the Caucasoid race.

It was one of the most humiliating events in Ancient history, a massive Empire eventually defeated by an assortment of City states who often fought with each other.

[Fractal]

Finally, I get to be the bystander with my popcorn and soda.

[LoLeL]

OP is a classic attention whore. Targeting different ethnic groups and try-harding to start shitstorm.

[MagnusAurelius]

OP is a classic attention whore. Targeting different ethnic groups and try-harding to start shitstorm.

I am not doing this for attention, this is a troll forum. I was bored and made a thread.

[Gangrel]

Finally, I get to be the bystander with my popcorn and soda.

nope

[zarzian]

Persians destroyrd the Greek Ionians and the only reason they lost to them in Mainland Greece is because of not knowing the terrain and Greece is a nightmare to fight in as cavalry. Greek infantry was only superior because of heavey metal armour meanwhile the immortals wore fabric clothing in battle. And the Persians used levantine, assyrian and other Auxiliaries in battle, who were not as motivated as much as the native greek soldiers whome understood that a loss would mean complete Greek extinction. The biggest cucks were your Roman and Irish ancestors which have been getting owned through out history, other then a few centuries of glory in Rome’s golden age.

[MagnusAurelius]

Persians destroyrd the Greek Ionians and the only reason they lost to them in Mainland Greece is because of not knowing the terrain and Greece is a nightmare to fight in as cavalry. Greek infantry was only superior because of heavey metal armour meanwhile the immortals wore fabric clothing in battle. And the Persians used levantine, assyrian and other Auxiliaries in battle, who were not as motivated as much as the native greek soldiers whome understood that a loss would mean complete Greek extinction. The biggest cucks were your Roman and Irish ancestors which have been getting owned through out history, other then a few centuries of glory in Rome’s golden age.

I don't think there is a comparison. The Roman Empire and Parthians/Sansanid Empires did have exhausted wars against each other that lead to stalemates and the Persians did win a lot but in the end, your people were cucked, owned, dominated, Islamized and raped by the Arab horde. Now Iranians are not much better than Pakistani's, Stolkhome syndrome idiots who love their Islam and the religion the invader brought them, the only thing that redeems Iranians a bit more is the fact that Shia Islam is more peaceful than Sunni Islam.

Irish owned? My Irish side is also Northern Ireland and Ireland was never overtly conquered and owned by the British Empire, it was a client kingdom through treaties. The ultimate act of being owned and defeated is when foreign invaders converts your ancestral homeland. Christianity in Europe, the religion was also developed by Europeans and the elite adopted the Religion, there was no conquering military force that forcefully converted/coerce the masses to convert. No foreign invaders.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_slaves_myth Also this, infowars conspiracy site promotes this myth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Persian_Wars Russia also beat the Persians more.

[zarzian]

I don't think there is a comparison. The Roman Empire and Parthians/Sansanid Empires did have exhausted wars against each other that lead to stalemates and the Persians did win a lot but in the end, your people were cucked, owned, dominated, Islamized and raped by the Arab horde. Now Iranians are not much better than Pakistani's, Stolkhome syndrome idiots who love their Islam and the religion the invader brought them, the only thing that redeems Iranians a bit more is the fact that Shia Islam is more peaceful than Sunni Islam.

Irish owned? My Irish side is also Northern Ireland and Ireland was never overtly conquered and owned by the British Empire, it was a client kingdom through treaties. The ultimate act of being owned and defeated is when foreign invaders converts your ancestral homeland. Christianity in Europe, the religion was also developed by Europeans and the elite adopted the Religion, there was no conquering military force that forcefully converted/coerce the masses to convert. No foreign invaders.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_slaves_myth Also this, infowars conspiracy site promotes this myth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Persian_Wars Russia also beat the Persians more.

Persians were never cucked even after the defeat by the Arabs, they were disenchanted with the Sassanians who had become suppressive of the native Iranian population due to corruption. There was no raping done by Arabs, if there was then it was for revenge of 1000 years of being ruled by Persians. Persians were quick to regain their past glories after the Arab defeat by having a renaissance and reigniting of Aryan pride, the work of Ferdausi is the proof for this. Byzantium only managed to repel Arabic forces again because of terrain and fortified cities, in open field combat they would have got destroyed as is the case for your ancestors, who fail miserably in open field combat, they are cowards as the Italian reputation as pussy cucks who surrendered in WW2 so easily. Not to mention losing to primitive African tribes who were outnumbered it still managed to destroy the Italian colonies in the horn of africa.

[Kamal900]

Persians were never cucked even after the defeat by the Arabs, they were disenchanted with the Sassanians who had become suppressive of the native Iranian population due to corruption. There was no raping done by Arabs, if there was then it was for revenge of 1000 years of being ruled by Persians. Persians were quick to regain their past glories after the Arab defeat by having a renaissance and reigniting of Aryan pride, the work of Ferdausi is the proof for this. Byzantium only managed to repel Arabic forces again because of terrain and fortified cities, in open field combat they would have got destroyed as is the case for your ancestors, who fail miserably in open field combat, they are cowards as the Italian reputation as pussy cucks who surrendered in WW2 so easily. Not to mention losing to primitive African tribes who were outnumbered it still managed to destroy the Italian colonies in the horn of africa.

Dude, why are you talking to him? I mean, he's a pernicious man-whore with a mind of a 10 year old child who has serious self esteem issues where he gloats about the achievements of others and so on, and bashing other peoples and creeds he deems as inferior to coup with his own people's inferiority complex. Arabs only ruled Iran just a century and a half until the Abbasids kicked the Ummuyads out, and establish an empire that was Islamic rather than Arabic and so on.

[MagnusAurelius]

Persians were never cucked even after the defeat by the Arabs, they were disenchanted with the Sassanians who had become suppressive of the native Iranian population due to corruption. There was no raping done by Arabs, if there was then it was for revenge of 1000 years of being ruled by Persians. Persians were quick to regain their past glories after the Arab defeat by having a renaissance and reigniting of Aryan pride, the work of Ferdausi is the proof for this. Byzantium only managed to repel Arabic forces again because of terrain and fortified cities, in open field combat they would have got destroyed as is the case for your ancestors, who fail miserably in open field combat, they are cowards as the Italian reputation as pussy cucks who surrendered in WW2 so easily. Not to mention losing to primitive African tribes who were outnumbered it still managed to destroy the Italian colonies in the horn of africa.

These are excuses, they lost, plain and simple. The Persian Empire never ruled all of the Arabs, the Romans didn't either. I don't think the Persians ever went deep into Arabia like the Romans. What defeat of Arabs? Not looking at things objectively.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamization_of_Iran There was no Arab defeat, don't delude yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romans_in_Arabia


The Ethiopian Empire was not primitive, the only African Empire that had modern weapons. There is nothing humiliating about this defeat looking at the numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Italo-Ethiopian_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzant...02%E2%80%93628 They were idiots for fighting each other for so long when they could have destroyed Islam but in the end, Iran was the victim of Islam, Terrain is just an excuse Mohammed and his Arab Tribe/Followers conquered and coerced/forcefully converted all the other Arabs to be Muslim during this time.

Yes, Italy did lose a lot in World War 2, they surrendered easily due to bad officers but not all units were ineffective.