1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,506 Given: 1,507 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
I'll read it when I have the time. But I'm specifically talking about that Moldovan E-V13 sample that they attributed to the Scythian culture even though it predates the Scythian or Daco-Getae culture unless they got the dating wrong. That sample has nothing to do directly with Dacians or Getae unless his descendants were the direct ancestors of Dacians. And attributing the other Scythians who had high neolithic admixture that gives them similarities to paleo-balkanites to Dacians based on their autosmal dna can also be wrong. They could have been direct descendants of yamnaya + neolithics and just happened to have higher neolithic admxiture but had no direct cultural ties to Dacians. That's all I'm saying. But I haven't read up much about this specific subject so I could be wrong.
Last edited by Daos777; 06-17-2020 at 11:39 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,506 Given: 1,507 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 132 Given: 14 |
Apparently Che Guevara belonged to haplogroup R1b. And he wasn't exactly a fairy-tale Prince of Peace.
3a-522x597-w1200@2x.jpg
"Yes, my father killed – but revolutions are almost always violent," Guevara's daughter, who lives in Cuba, said in a speech in England.
Che: An assassin or a revolutionary?
https://archive.is/VgiNZ#selection-1499.0-1499.252My paternal haplogroup was reported as ‘R1b1a1a2a1a1c2a1’ which I was impressed to discover was easy to research online, and I quickly found my position on several Y DNA phylogenetic trees. My paternal migratory path with top-line info is shown below:
https://archive.is/PIvc4Che Guevara, from Communist Firebrand to Capitalist Brand ... making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine.
Last edited by VikLevaPatel; 01-07-2022 at 12:39 AM.
Y-DNA (P): R1b-S47 (Irish/Scot), E1b1b1 (Proto-Semitic), C1b-Z5896. mtDNA (M): W6 (Gotland/Sweden). Ancient (European) Origins: Indo-European (Metal Age Invader) 67%, Early/First/Neolithic European Farmer (EEF/FEF/ENF) 8–10%, WHG 3–7%; Turkey 20–30%; Caucasian-Anatolian-Balkan 40–43%; Volga Region 18–20%; Ukrainian 11–12%; Viking 10%; Scandinavian 6–7% EHG–Steppe: Corded Ware 28–34, Yamnaya (Steppe Pastoralist) 23–25%, Bell Beaker 22–24%; Steppe to SCAsian 20–23%; Euro HG 11-12% CHG/Iran: Caucasus (CHG) 31–33%; Iran_N 54–60%; IVC 64-67%
Thumbs Up |
Received: 386 Given: 368 |
Origin of E-M35 lineages explained:
Ancestral North African, ANA(separated from OOA before basal Eurasians did)> Mushabian culture in North Africa, Eastern Africa>Mushabians migrating west (E-M78) forming the Iberomaurusians, Mushabians that migrated east into Levant mixed with local Kebaran culture to form natufians(E-Z827)> Cardialware culture that was found through Levant and North Africa > E-M78 Europe, or E-M78 could have entered Europe in the Mesolithic from Gibraltar.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,539 Given: 4,803 |
https://www.yfull.com/tree/E-V22/
The E-V22 and all its subclades look at all the European flags, there are more every day, look at the TMRCA dates.
A new user has just put England in first place. formed 8100 ybp, TMRCA 6200 ybp
https://www.yfull.com/tree/E-BY7449/
E-V22 - E-BY7449 - E-BY7566 - E-FT155550
According to oral family tradition E-FT155550 comes from a deserter of Napoleon's troops (1808-1813) who stayed in Spain and changed his surname.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,533 Given: 1,371 |
E-M81 is somewhat recent in Northwest Africa, having migrated from the Middle East/Northeast Africa. The Iberomaurusians being E-M78. The fact that the oldest E-L618 was found in Spain points to an entry through Gibraltar. It then mutated into E-V13 and spread east, and then it went through two huge bottlenecks in Central Europe and spread again from there. From then on it seems to be explained here well enough.
Furthermore, most recent studies point to DE, and then E*, having originated somewhere in the Middle East in a Proto-Caucasian population, and then entering Africa. The Saharan branches having stayed Caucasian, and the Subsaharan branches having conquered and mixed with original pigmy like Subsaharan A and B populations. Therefore, all this talk about E* or E1b1 being originally non-Caucasian is BS, mainly propagated to make Europeans feel less white and be more hospitable to non white migrants.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,078 Given: 911 |
Natufians
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks