Serbian K36 Map

[Lavrentis]

K36 map, no matter modern or ancient represent current distance to people in region.

i.e.

It doesn't matter what we are measuring, we are measuring how close you are to my results.

I think that I have read that K36 is used for measuring similarity between ancient populations, so maybe that's why the results in Romania seem weird. Post his results from other calculators


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Bosniensis]

I misread, my bad. But the map still looks weird, especially in regards to Romania. But I guess that is just an individual outlier.

This is my (my dna result)

(unlik that guy, I live in Bosnia similar results:

[Bosniensis]

I think that I have read that K36 is used for measuring similarity between ancient populations, so maybe that's why the results in Romania seem weird. Post his results from other calculators


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

His Eurogenes K13:

# Population Percent
1 North_Atlantic 27.11
2 Baltic 24.6
3 West_Med 18.18
4 East_Med 17.42
5 West_Asian 8.24
6 Red_Sea 1.26
7 Amerindian 0.81
8 East_Asian 0.78
9 Siberian 0.61
10 South_Asian 0.59
11 Oceanian 0.39

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Romanian 3.86
2 Serbian 3.98
3 Bulgarian 6.16
4 Moldavian 10.74
5 Hungarian 11.12
6 Croatian 12.71
7 Greek_Thessaly 13.03
8 Austrian 13.16
9 North_Italian 14.02
10 East_German 15.1
11 Tuscan 15.5
12 West_German 16.33
13 French 16.41
14 South_Dutch 17.83
15 Portuguese 17.85
16 Spanish_Galicia 18.37
17 Italian_Abruzzo 18.49
18 Spanish_Cataluna 18.91
19 Spanish_Extremadura 19.25
20 Ukrainian_Lviv 19.35

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 57% Tuscan + 43% Ukrainian @ 1.79
2 60.9% Tuscan + 39.1% Southwest_Russian @ 1.89
3 61.3% Tuscan + 38.7% Ukrainian_Belgorod @ 1.94
4 55% Croatian + 45% Tuscan @ 1.99
5 80.3% Serbian + 19.7% North_Italian @ 2.06
6 91.7% Serbian + 8.3% Sardinian @ 2.07
7 82.2% Serbian + 17.8% Tuscan @ 2.18
8 53.8% Greek_Thessaly + 46.2% East_German @ 2.22
9 80.4% Bulgarian + 19.6% Southeast_English @ 2.34
10 67% Tuscan + 33% Lithuanian @ 2.34
11 62.6% Tuscan + 37.4% Russian_Smolensk @ 2.35
12 55.9% Tuscan + 44.1% South_Polish @ 2.36
13 62.9% Tuscan + 37.1% Estonian_Polish @ 2.38
14 55.6% Tuscan + 44.4% Ukrainian_Lviv @ 2.4
15 75.7% Bulgarian + 24.3% South_Dutch @ 2.41
16 87.9% Romanian + 12.1% Southwest_French @ 2.42
17 54.1% Hungarian + 45.9% Greek_Thessaly @ 2.46
18 50% West_Sicilian + 50% South_Polish @ 2.49
19 81.8% Bulgarian + 18.2% Southwest_English @ 2.5
20 84.7% Romanian + 15.3% French @

[Novi Pazar]

Funny thing is: Serbian people are more related to French people than Russians

Remember, underlying the French, is the Slavic Gauls!

[Tschaikisten]

[PostOak1]

A very interesting high percentage in Switzerland and Southern Germany. My ancestors with a lot of ancestry from those areas looked like swarthy Dinarics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Geni_kameni]

Bump
I would like to see maps k36

[Dušan]

Bump
I would like to see maps k36

Here is mine.

[hazmatnik]

Maternal grandma (SE Serbia, before 1880. Vlasina and WSW Bulgaria)



Maternal grandpa (SE Serbia, before 1880. Tran (Трън)
area and Kosovo somewhere in Gnjilane area)




Paternal grandma (Sumadija, ancestors from Stari Vlah, Montenegro and sumadijski starinci)



Maternal aunt (SE Serbia)



Paternal aunt (Sumadija)



And me

[JamesBond007]

K36 map, no matter modern or ancient represent current distance to people in region.

i.e.

It doesn't matter what we are measuring, we are measuring how close you are to my results.

this is a map from a guy who lives in Serbia.

This map has to be wrong. So apparently, South Germans are closer to Moldovans than to Austrians? Lol.

The higher the k the more innacurate generally but K13 works better here but K15 is better for Northwestern/Western European.