1
Anglo-Saxon countries (Ireland, the UK, Malta, Cyprus). In Anglo-Saxon
countries, unemployment insurance benefits are relatively modest, while
unemployment assistance is a relevant means-tested instrument to provide
income protection to the unemployed. Expenditure on means tested full time
unemployment benefits often exceeds non-means tested unemployment
benefits. While unemployment traps are not a major issue, benefit dependency
is a risk on account of nearly flat-rate and long-lasting unemployment
assistance. To counter benefit dependency, monitoring of job-search activity is
strict whilst active labour market policies play a less important role.
Southern countries (Spain, Italy, Portugal). The generosity of unemployment
insurance generosity varies widely depending on age and contribution period
of the unemployed. Eligibility rules for unemployment insurance benefits are
relatively strict. Unemployment assistance is of little relevance, as well as the
risk of inactivity traps. Activation policies play a relatively minor role, while
making the continuation of provision of unemployment insurance conditional
to the participation in active labour market policies is more widespread.
ƒCentral and Eastern countries (Greece, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia,
Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania, Latvia). This group
of countries tends to exhibit a tight unemployment benefit system both in terms
of benefit support per unemployed and benefit coverage. Although
11
replacement rates at the beginning of the unemployment spell can be high in
some cases, benefits drop sharply after the first year of unemployment. While
unemployment assistance plays a minor role, the unemployed can draw on
substantial means-tested income support provided by housing and social
benefits. Relatively strict conditions on job search and active participation of
labour market policies often apply.
Greece got threw in with Central/Eastern??
Bookmarks