Map of J2b2-L283

[Lavrentis]

In Greece it is correlated with Arvanites. Interesting Arvanite J2b2 % is higher than in Tosks.

I doubt that it's that high in parts of Greece that were never settled by Arvanites, such as Macedonia or Thrace. But we can see from the map that Corinth and Argolis i.e places that Arvanites settled the most, has a significat portion of it

[Danaan]

Yh, there is an Arvanite who is J2b2-Y23094 and some others who belong to the PH1751 group. The data used was an amount of scientific studies across Europe mainly

I think you (or the person who made it) were a little creative. What type of data do you have concerning J2b2-L83 in Greece?

[Kelmendasi]

I think you (or the person who made it) were a little creative. What type of data do you have concerning J2b2-L83 in Greece?

I didn't make it, some other person from our project did and it seems pretty good. I knew some people would react like this . The data used is from actual scientific papers of haplotypes in Europe

[Catholic Riffs]

I doubt that it's that high in parts of Greece that were never settled by Arvanites, such as Macedonia or Thrace. But we can see from the map that Corinth and Argolis i.e places that Arvanites settled the most, has a significat portion of it

The problem is that many Greeks don't even know they have Arvanite ancestry (or Vlach, for that matter).

[Danaan]

I didn't make it, some other person from our project did and it seems pretty good. I knew some people would react like this . The data used is from actual scientific papers of haplotypes in Europe

Well, personally I react like this to maps made by Maciamo of Eupedia too, or those made by someone called 'Passa' in Anthrogenica. They are not scientific and guesswork is involved.
One user (Rob/ Gravetto-Danubian) who is a Slav of some short makes up data too during casual discussions. I wouldn't trust any map made by him either.

[Kelmendasi]

Well, personally I react like this to maps made by Maciamo of Eupedia too, or those made by someone called 'Passa' in Anthrogenica. They are not scientific and guesswork is involved.
One user (Rob/ Gravetto-Danubian) who is a Slav of some short makes up data too during casual discussions. I wouldn't trust any map made by him either.

Thing is though that they are based on scientific papers. If you don't want to believe it because you don't like the results then that's not the fault of the guy who made this

[Krampus]

I didn't make it, some other person from our project did and it seems pretty good. I knew some people would react like this . The data used is from actual scientific papers of haplotypes in Europe

Ayo hol up

I just realized your J1 and not J2. How tf?

[Kelmendasi]

Ayo hol up

I just realized your J1 and not J2. How tf?

Rare nigga that's why

[Danaan]

Thing is though that they are based on scientific papers. If you don't want to believe it because you don't like the results then that's not the fault of the guy who made this

You say that they are based on scientific papers.

I say that the scientific papers do not provide enough data to create a map like this.

If the data exist I want to see them.

[Kelmendasi]

You say that they are based on scientific papers.

I say that the scientific papers do not provide enough data to create a map like it.

If the data exist I want to see them.

Will ask for the papers. What's so unbelievable about this map?