View Poll Results: Whos more mongoloid?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Samis

    11 61.11%
  • Tatars

    7 38.89%
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 63

Thread: Are tatars or samis more mongoloid?

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    12-08-2018 @ 06:13 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Ancestry
    Oğuz / Turcoman
    Country
    Turkey
    Gender
    Posts
    10,237
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,722
    Given: 1,300

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marmara View Post
    Anatolian Turks are Oghuz Turks while Crimean Tatars are Kipchaks, they arrived with the mongol conquest and Crimean Khanate was found after the dissolution of Golden Horde, so Crimean Tatars aren't from Turkey. Crimean Tatars and Anatolians aren't the same we have Crimean Tatars in Turkey they look distinct, much more Mongoloid than an usual Turk. We had one in my school he had slanted eyes. Not all of them have slanted eyes but they still have much more Mongoloid on average.
    Hell.
    You talk nonsense.
    Yalıboylu Crimean Tatars are Oğuz Turks.
    The half south of the Crimean Peninsula are Oğuz.

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    12-08-2018 @ 06:13 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Ancestry
    Oğuz / Turcoman
    Country
    Turkey
    Gender
    Posts
    10,237
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,722
    Given: 1,300

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Eurovision contest winner Jamala, who sang for Ukraine a song in half-English half-Turkic language.



    The Turkic part of her song is Yalıboylu type Tatar language (Strongly Oğuz with Kypchak).

    It's why that is mutually intelligible (96%) with Turkish language from Turkey.

  3. #13
    Not even a member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    04-23-2024 @ 10:45 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Indo-European, Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian
    Country
    Brunei
    Region
    Russian Turkestan General Governorship
    Y-DNA
    R1a-YP270
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    24,142
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,591
    Given: 8,909

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    The Crimean samples I've seen so far were all over 20% mongoloid and the percentage of Baltic and that kind of stuff was higher than that of Anatolian Turks.

  4. #14
    Veteran Member Marmara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:24 PM
    Location
    Istanbul
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Country
    Turkey
    Region
    Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality
    Gender
    Posts
    12,592
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,924
    Given: 2,964

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Böri View Post
    Hell.
    You talk nonsense.
    Yalıboylu Crimean Tatars are Oğuz Turks.
    The half south of the Crimean Peninsula are Oğuz.
    Okay so some of them are Oghuz

  5. #15
    Veteran Member Seya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    02-28-2024 @ 02:57 PM
    Location
    Izmir
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Eastern Romance
    Ethnicity
    Romanian
    Ancestry
    Vlacho-Cuman
    Country
    Romania
    Y-DNA
    I2 (I-S17250)
    mtDNA
    T2b
    Gender
    Posts
    10,359
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14,320
    Given: 7,523

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    tatars here look central asian...but volga tatars don't look asian at all to my eyes.

  6. #16
    Senior Member Pizdastratos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    10-25-2021 @ 11:07 PM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    508
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 221
    Given: 39

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marmara View Post
    Anatolian Turks are Oghuz Turks while Crimean Tatars are Kipchaks, they arrived with the mongol conquest and Crimean Khanate was found after the dissolution of Golden Horde, so Crimean Tatars aren't from Turkey. Crimean Tatars and Anatolians aren't the same we have Crimean Tatars in Turkey they look distinct, much more Mongoloid than an usual Turk. We had one in my school he had slanted eyes. Not all of them have slanted eyes but they still have much more Mongoloid on average.
    I'm not saying they are from Turkey. But I put forward here the crimeans and the anatolians have identical ancient and medieval origin before turkic invasions. And language doesn't matter at all, but southern crimeans speak an Oghuz dialect if it's so important to you.
    The fact that crimeans look a bit different is just illustrative of how densely populated Anatolia was and population of it was able to absorb mongoloid element far more successfully

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    12-08-2018 @ 06:13 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Ancestry
    Oğuz / Turcoman
    Country
    Turkey
    Gender
    Posts
    10,237
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,722
    Given: 1,300

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Seljuk conquest of southern Crimea and later, Mongol favouring of Turks:

    Quote Originally Posted by Böri View Post
    So let us summarize the story:
    when Slavs of Kievan Rus defeated Khazars in alliance with Byzantines and some Turkic tribes east of Khazars, the Slavic and Italian colonist people became more prominent in southern Ukraine and Crimea. Things changed when Batu Khan founded the Golden Horde and started to invade Eastern Europe. He favored Turkic groups against Slavs. Berke who became great Khan after him converted and then Seljuk Sultan of Rum married his daughter to him. In return, Berke favored and even called Anatolian Turks (Oghuz or Turkmen tribal peoples) settle in Crimea and south Ukraine.

    The Crimean Tatar, Alan W. Fisher, Part One: The Crimean Tatar Khanate, Chapter I: The origins of the Crimean Tatar Khanate





    Quote Originally Posted by Marmara View Post
    Okay so some of them are Oghuz
    Nowadays you started to bullshit more and more about the history of Turks.
    First implying that Yenisei Kyrgyz (people with light features) were not Turkic, then go tell Turks have in common with Levantine people, now come and tell that Crimean Tatars are all separate from Turks.

    You are not evolving in the good direction my Kebab friend.

  8. #18
    Veteran Member Marmara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:24 PM
    Location
    Istanbul
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Country
    Turkey
    Region
    Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality
    Gender
    Posts
    12,592
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,924
    Given: 2,964

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pizdastratos View Post
    I'm not saying they are from Turkey. But I put forward here the crimeans and the anatolians have identical ancient and medieval origin before turkic invasions. And language doesn't matter at all, but southern crimeans speak an Oghuz dialect if it's so important to you.
    The fact that crimeans look a bit different is just illustrative of how densely populated Anatolia was and population of it was able to absorb mongoloid element far more successfully
    Or maybe becasue they arrived with the Mongols, and that is why they're more Mongoloid on average. Oghuz Turks were not that mongoloid even at the beginning, besides, even Yörüks (largely unmixed Oghuz Turks who kept their nomadic tradition for centuries) score less mongoloid. I wasn't aware there were some Oghuz Turks in South Crimea migrated from Anatolia so now i'm in doubt, those Crimeans must be much more Turkish-looking on average.

    Anatolia absorbed enough Turkic to make a distinction, Kipchaks and Oghuzes are two seperate people don't get confused.

  9. #19
    Veteran Member Marmara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:24 PM
    Location
    Istanbul
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Country
    Turkey
    Region
    Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality
    Gender
    Posts
    12,592
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,924
    Given: 2,964

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Böri View Post
    Seljuk conquest of southern Crimea and later, Mongol favouring of Turks:









    Nowadays you started to bullshit more and more about the history of Turks.
    First implying that Yenisei Kyrgyz (people with light features) were not Turkic, then go tell Turks have in common with Levantine people, now come and tell that Crimean Tatars are all separate from Turks.

    You are not evolving in the good direction my Kebab friend.
    I didn't say Yenisei Kyrgyzs weren't Turkic, i said they had heavy IE component. Are red head and blue eyes Turkic features? It's a fact Turks were middle-easternized even before arriving to Anatolia, and lately i was making something clear, some might have guessed that the Crimean Tatars are just Ottoman settlers.

  10. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    12-08-2018 @ 06:13 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Ancestry
    Oğuz / Turcoman
    Country
    Turkey
    Gender
    Posts
    10,237
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,722
    Given: 1,300

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marmara View Post
    I didn't say Yenisei Kyrgyzs weren't Turkic, i said they had heavy IE component. Are red head and blue eyes Turkic features? It's a fact Turks were middle-easternized even before arriving to Anatolia, and lately i was making something clear, some might have guessed that the Crimean Tatars are just Ottoman settlers.
    Red hair and blue eyes are patented Indo-European features? Turkic and especially Finno-Ugric people, along with Caucasians can have such features.
    What middle Easternization?
    We crushed Arabs in early 8th century in Sogdiana and pushed them back. Turkic victories over Arab armies brought the end of Umeyyad rule, preparing ground for Abbasid revolts.

    The only Middle eastern thing about us back then and now it's the religion. And got it from Khorasani Iranics not MENA's. Sort of people like Tajiks.
    Now extinct.

    It's not for you to teach us online who we are or so.

    Actually we have nothing to do with Syrians or Lebanese, while we have almost all in common with Crimean Tatars.
    Better not commenting on stuff you don't know, like we have seen in the previous page.

    Wise person is he who doesnt talk about what he knows not.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-19-2018, 01:41 AM
  2. classify two tatars
    By greasycaveman in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-14-2018, 06:36 PM
  3. Are Tatars White?
    By Siberyak in forum Россия
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 11-17-2016, 12:43 PM
  4. Tatars
    By Majar in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 479
    Last Post: 12-25-2013, 03:32 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •