0
Samis
Tatars
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Eurovision contest winner Jamala, who sang for Ukraine a song in half-English half-Turkic language.
The Turkic part of her song is Yalıboylu type Tatar language (Strongly Oğuz with Kypchak).
It's why that is mutually intelligible (96%) with Turkish language from Turkey.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,591 Given: 8,909 |
The Crimean samples I've seen so far were all over 20% mongoloid and the percentage of Baltic and that kind of stuff was higher than that of Anatolian Turks.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,320 Given: 7,523 |
tatars here look central asian...but volga tatars don't look asian at all to my eyes.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 221 Given: 39 |
I'm not saying they are from Turkey. But I put forward here the crimeans and the anatolians have identical ancient and medieval origin before turkic invasions. And language doesn't matter at all, but southern crimeans speak an Oghuz dialect if it's so important to you.
The fact that crimeans look a bit different is just illustrative of how densely populated Anatolia was and population of it was able to absorb mongoloid element far more successfully
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Seljuk conquest of southern Crimea and later, Mongol favouring of Turks:
Nowadays you started to bullshit more and more about the history of Turks.
First implying that Yenisei Kyrgyz (people with light features) were not Turkic, then go tell Turks have in common with Levantine people, now come and tell that Crimean Tatars are all separate from Turks.
You are not evolving in the good direction my Kebab friend.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,924 Given: 2,964 |
Or maybe becasue they arrived with the Mongols, and that is why they're more Mongoloid on average. Oghuz Turks were not that mongoloid even at the beginning, besides, even Yörüks (largely unmixed Oghuz Turks who kept their nomadic tradition for centuries) score less mongoloid. I wasn't aware there were some Oghuz Turks in South Crimea migrated from Anatolia so now i'm in doubt, those Crimeans must be much more Turkish-looking on average.
Anatolia absorbed enough Turkic to make a distinction, Kipchaks and Oghuzes are two seperate people don't get confused.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,924 Given: 2,964 |
I didn't say Yenisei Kyrgyzs weren't Turkic, i said they had heavy IE component. Are red head and blue eyes Turkic features? It's a fact Turks were middle-easternized even before arriving to Anatolia, and lately i was making something clear, some might have guessed that the Crimean Tatars are just Ottoman settlers.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Red hair and blue eyes are patented Indo-European features? Turkic and especially Finno-Ugric people, along with Caucasians can have such features.
What middle Easternization?
We crushed Arabs in early 8th century in Sogdiana and pushed them back. Turkic victories over Arab armies brought the end of Umeyyad rule, preparing ground for Abbasid revolts.
The only Middle eastern thing about us back then and now it's the religion. And got it from Khorasani Iranics not MENA's. Sort of people like Tajiks.
Now extinct.
It's not for you to teach us online who we are or so.
Actually we have nothing to do with Syrians or Lebanese, while we have almost all in common with Crimean Tatars.
Better not commenting on stuff you don't know, like we have seen in the previous page.
Wise person is he who doesnt talk about what he knows not.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks