Think-tank to sue Google, Twitter and Yahoo over Holocaust denial content

[PHDNM]

Think-tank to sue Google, Twitter and Yahoo over Holocaust denial content

A think-tank has threatened to sue Google, Yahoo and Twitter for hosting content that promotes Holocaust denial and virulent antisemitism

The Lawfare Project, a civil rights litigation fund which aims to pursue to antisemitic discrimination around the world, said the internet giants could face legal action for failing to address the problem in their search results.

https://www.thejc.com/news/world/thi...spain-1.459133

[wvwvw]

They should be sued for denying the Armenian Genocide.

The Jewish holocaust is already recognized by nearly all countries in the world, and the perpetrator Germany has already compensated the victims of the holocaust. Germany has sincerely apologized to the Jews and has been shamed by the rest of the world.

So it really doesn’t matter if some deny the holocaust, as long as there is an official recognition in place. The real shameful thing is the denial of the Armenian genocide, by its perpetrators, despite the unanimous position of genocide scholars that affirm it was a genocide.

[wvwvw]

The Lawfare Project, a civil rights litigation fund which aims to pursue to antisemitic discrimination around the world, said the internet giants could face legal action for failing to address the problem in their search results.

https://www.thejc.com/news/world/thi...spain-1.459133

They use the holocaust as a pretext to stifle any criticism of Israel/Jews, whether that criticism is legimate or not.

In the same way that Muslims use Islamophobia to stifle criticism of Islam and Muslims.

[Bosniensis]

They use the holocaust as a pretext to stifle any criticism of Israel/Jews, whether that criticism is legimate or not.

In the same way that Muslims use Islamophobia to stifle criticism of Islam and Muslims.

Islamophobia is a crime against humanity, and form of Fascism.

2 billion muslims can't be responsible for 10.000 terrorists.

[wvwvw]

Islamophobia is a crime against humanity, and form of Fascism.

2 billion muslims can't be responsible for 10.000 terrorists.

Terrorists kill for an ideology, in this case Islam. Islam is an ideology not a race. Rejection of an ideology cannot be classified as phobia. All ideologies have their critics and opponents but we do not hear communists calling their critics communitophobe or Hindus calling theirs hinduphobe.

According to Dictionary.com Phobia is “a persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite the awareness and reassurance that it is not dangerous.” Therefore "Islamophobia" implies that Islam is not dangerous and the fear of it is irrational.

This claim has not been established and it is not universally agreed upon. There are many who argue that Islam is indeed a dangerous ideology and they have their logical arguments to prove their claim. Irrespective of whether the critics of Islam are right or wrong about whether Islam is dangerous or not, calling them “phobic” implies that their criticism has been already refuted and the irrationality of their fear of Islamic threat has been established.

All ideologies have their opponents. It is sheer arrogance to call criticism of any ideology, phobia. This implies that the truth of that ideology is already established and anyone opposing it is adopting an irrational position and is in need of psychological help.

Only Muslims are capable of this much irrationality and arrogance. Recall Muhammad Abdullah, the Afghani man who converted to Christianity and who was facing execution. When the government of Afghanistan was pressured to release him, to save face they accused him of being insane and not fit to stand trial. In the mind of Muslims only an insane person would disagree with Islam. This is sheer arrogance.

Buddhism is by all accounts a peaceful religion as non-violence is the core of it. Despite that Buddhism has its critics and we never call then Buddhistphobes.

The neologism Islamophobia makes absolutely no sense. It is derogatory and is used in a pejorative way to discredit the critics of Islam from the outset.

Phobia is irrational fear of things, people or situations but not beliefs. You can't be phobic of a belief system. Beliefs per se are not frightening. It's people who follow nefarious beliefs that become dangerous and frightening. As one can see, the very term "Islamophobia" is stupid because Islam is a belief system and it is not possible to be phobic of a belief. From whichever angle you look at Islam you find its stupidity glaring at you.

It is a human right to disagree with any belief. Calling that disagreement “phobia” is a logical fallacy. Islam is the only ideology, whose followers try to discredit its critics by calling their criticism "phobia".

Islamophobia makes no sense at all. It is as meaningless as "Fascistophobia". Of course people have the right to disagree and criticize any ideology, whether good or bad. The goodness of an ideology is in the eyes of the beholder. Inhibiting criticism of an ideology is infringing upon the basic human rights, which is freedom of speech.

The absurdity of the Muslim mind is such that they think it is okay for them to incite hate against the non-Muslims in general and yet it is not okay for others to criticize their ideology of hate. Behind this paranoia and phobia of criticism is the inability of Muslims to counter the valid criticism of Islam. Failing that, they resort to ad hominem and try to discredit its critics by undermining their character.

It is the symptom of the intellectual bankruptcy of Muslim clerisy to come up with logical arguments and defend Islam against criticism in a rational way. It highlights the fact that Islam is a lie, unable to withstand criticism. That is why Muslims need censorship and must eliminate the truth by brutal force (law suits or violence) to protect their lie.

[Bobby Martnen]

Islamophobia is a crime against humanity, and form of Fascism.

2 billion muslims can't be responsible for 10.000 terrorists.

Islamophobia, Germanophobia, Hellenophobia, Italophobia, Russophobia, Sinophobia, none of these are crimes against humanity.

Are they somewhat bigoted opinions?

Yes, but holding a bigoted opinion is not a crime against humanity.

A crime against humanity is like a genocide or ethnic cleansing, not an unsavory opinion about an identity group.