0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,627 Given: 10,176 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,848 Given: 3,647 |
Only pelasgians should be considered native
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,070 Given: 14,266 |
Lol have you read any of the papers on Minoan and Mycanaean DNA?
They had common ancestry and their DNA was very similar with only minor differences.
Of course Minoans were not exactly the same culturally with Mycanaeans since Minoans lived in Crete and the Islands.
Logically they did alot of seafare and established very early trade and contact via the Mediteranean with the Levant and Egypt but genetically
they were not related to them.
The Mycanaeans populated the Mainland and only later moved to Crete and the Islands they were more warlike and militarily organised which
is also logical.
The main difference between Mycanaeans and Minoans is that Mycanaeans had some NE admixture from people in the Steppes 8%-10%.
The Mycanaean script has been deciphered and shown to have been a Greek language.
The Minoan language is still unkown.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,627 Given: 10,176 |
Yes, I would read Sikeliotized posts on how the matriarchial Minoans were an earlier form of Mycenean people. By warlike you mean that they made scary faces in the battleground?
There is a whole different culture in many accounts, as for the Mycenean language it has of course been deciphered as Greek and rather proto-Greek. If Minonas spoke the same language it would probably be also deciphered by now(Raine spam incoming). In any case, there has been a lot of intermingling with early Greek civilizations for the Mycenean kingdoms to form, most likely they were Steppe tsopanos in the beginning but no matter what they were there are big differences between them and Minoans even after Minoan trade and interaction to make them similar civilizations.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks