0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
That's Byzantine dome. Armenian Mimar Sinan, as a result of his lack of creativity simply copy pasted Hagia Sophia dome with blue mosque (Süleymaniye) and that is now revived for decades all over the country by neo-Ottomanists. You like it or not.
Ottomans had their own style like seen at Bursa mosque of 1399. They were poisoned after 1453.
That you posted of late style, western-influenced Baroque mosque of Ortaköy is nice yeah.
Neo-Ottomanist Mosque-Supermarket combination: Uber architecture!
Dünyada mal ahirette iman.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Petrograd / Leningrad/ St Petersburg has western, European architecture. Moscow has the non-European, East Slavic, onion domes architecture. As a result of struggle against what they call 'Western imperialism, the Slavic nationalist and Bolshevik forces transferred Russian capital from Petrograd to Moscow.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,764 Given: 2,769 |
Istanbul without doubt!!!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
That can be a good point of view but building same Byzantine style mosques from Edirne to Hakkari everywhere is pathetic. Even in places like Konya or Adana which have their own historical style are poisoned, they build new mosques in that Byzantine-Mimar Sinan style. When you travel by car through highways around the country you also see the mosque-supermarket combination.
That's pathetic and awful. Skyscrapers and futurist style construction are better imo.
Esenler Semazen mosque. New style. That looks better.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,951 Given: 5,518 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,216 Given: 5,754 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks