Yes, Brazil would be a more influential country if we were hispanophone.
No, it wouldn't make a diference if we spoke Spanish. Influence goes way beyond language
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25,690 Given: 23,946 |
California, haha. it is ironic that you dont want to go to these Spanish-speaking countries but you do want to... California ha ha haOriginally Posted by Heather Duval
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 9,836 Given: 5,025 |
Até onde sei ele não proibiu a entrada de imigrantes, mas sim queria abrasileirar-los devido a sua política nacionalista e por isso suprimiu línguas que não fossem o português.
Mas o português soa mais belo que o espanhol. Uma característica do Brasil que devemos nos orgulhar.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 6,852 Given: 3,187 |
Most people in California speak English and USA is a first world country. If America hispanica was good, Miami and California were not be full of them.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25,690 Given: 23,946 |
How not, if it is their homeland??
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 6,852 Given: 3,187 |
Ele controlou a imigração, o Brasil teria mais Italianos por exemplo. Ele criou uma lei de cotas. Espanhóis, Italianos, Alemães etc tiveram até que mudar o sobrenome. Conheço uma atriz de origem Espanhola com sobrenome Abrasileirado hahaha
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 6,852 Given: 3,187 |
Refugees who left Cuba and others shit to try to live a dignified life in the United States.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25,690 Given: 23,946 |
These Cubans are related to that Caribean area which includes Florida
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 9,295 Given: 26,310 |
It isn't their homeland, any more than Sleswick is an Englishman's homeland because some of his ancestors lived there a long time ago.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25,690 Given: 23,946 |
Yes, when Anglos arrived there idk if you know but their ancestors already lived there since some thousands of years ago
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 423 Given: 83 |
If Brazilians were Hispanic:
1. Brazil might have overtaken Mexico as the most influential Latin American country, albeit Mexico has closer ties to the U.S.
2. The "Hispanic" percentage in the U.S., particularly in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, The Tri-State, and Florida would rise dramatically since Brazilians aren't classified as "Latinos" in the U.S as of now.
3. There would probably be even more immigration between Brazil and Spanish-speaking Latin American countries. Because of Brazil's growing economy, it could become the "California" of South America and draw tons of Colombians, Venezuelans, Peruvians, Bolivians, Paraguayans, and even Argentines who won't be deterred by the language barrier. Similarly, there would be more Brazilians in various parts of Latin America.
4. Hispanics will no longer be seen as strictly Mestizos, Southern Euros, and Amerindians in phenotype by the outside world. People will become more familiarized with Spanish speakers who look Nordic/Germanic, Black/mulatto, or Japanese/East Asian.
5. Brazil will have MUCH bigger tensions with Spanish speaking Latin American countries than it currently does, particularly with Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico.
6. Brazilian Spanish will become a thing and quite popular. Since Brazil has the largest Andalusian population outside of Spain as it is already, it will presumably have a strong Andalusian/Canarian influence similar to Venezuela and the Latin Caribbean. Brazil will also become the biggest Spanish speaking country in the world on top of that.
7. Music and media from Brazil will become more popular throughout other parts of Latin America
That's all I can think of off the top of my head.
Honestly, I prefer Brazil being a Lusophone nation. It adds a lot of uniqueness to the region.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Latin America
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks