Would you marry a woman who isn't a virgin?

[Bobby Martnen]

Marriage is invalid unless the bride is chaste.

Agreed.

[The Lawspeaker]

Yes, I would. LOL good luck in finding a virgin to marry.

"Why Christ wasn't born in Europe: God couldn't find three wise men, let alone a virgin !"

[ÁGUIA]

Thinking non virgin women lose any of their value as a person, is quite the fucked up train of thought, but incels and dweebs will be incels and dweebs. The ladies are not objects my dudes, to be equated for example to a pair of shoes that gets worn with use ...

Of course I would, to respond the OP.

[The Lawspeaker]

Sure, I will marry my fiancee. No problem. You know: I am the one that took her virginity.

[Teutone]

a virgin best material for marriage but harder to find than your foreskin

At the end it doesnt matter if you honest to yourself

[Papastratosels26]

Yes.

Στάλθηκε από το G3311 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk

[Thanas Django]

Sure, I will marry my fiancee. No problem. You know: I am the one that took her virginity.

We are facing a migrant crisis and here you are humblebragging and being a giant dick instead of protecting your country's borders. What a tool.

[Pitsa]

no

[The Lawspeaker]

Here's why someone like Jesus Christ could never be born in modern Europe: they wouldn't be able to find three wise men - let alone a virgin.

[The Lawspeaker]

In this present situation, you should be more pragmatic: should you marry a woman that "has around town" ? No. Absolutely not. But should you marry a woman that has had one or two long relationships where sex played a part ? I don't see why not.

First we need to understand that people used to marry at a much younger age (particularly women, actually --- the average age for a woman to get married in 17th century Netherlands would have been between 15/16 and 19 where her betrothed (and, yes, they were, among the free burghers, love marriages where the family had just sorted out the legal, religious and financial sides of the story) would have been in his mid-20s) and that engagement periods took much shorter: anything between 3 to 6 months (in fact - this is why the Dutch still use the phase of Ondertrouw in which things are arranged and which has become separated from the actual engagement period over time). With the whole courting thing ? Maybe up to 9 months to a year. In those days, sexual relations, once engaged were also the norm (and they were socially accepted !)

These days, you can have relationships up to 10 years without married because the legal/economic/domestic environment, simply, isn't conducive to marriage. So, yes, people have sex in that period but it is still within the framework of a monogamous relationship.