Does modern-day prudery derive more from feminism or social/religious conservatism?

[Tooting Carmen]

Are the growing calls to censor depictions of women's bodies (but not, I hasten to add, those of men), to ban or at least severely restrict pornography and prostitution, to abolish glamour girls in sports competitions and to some extent to even police male-female relationships mostly due to a supposedly 'progressive' feminism, or more from a resurgent social/religious conservatism?

[Marinus]

I would say that religious conservatism is decreasing, let's look at Brazil for example, it is very religious, yet we're very promiscuous. We keep the traditions in some sense, but pussy is too good to pass and abstinance from a religious point of view is completely discarded.

Whilst MGTOW and just a disdain for romantic relationships in general is growing in the West regardless of nationality or religion, caused by feminazism and gynocentric laws. More out of survival than ideological conviction to be honest.

[Odin]

Feminism.

[Tooting Carmen]

bump

[Tooting Carmen]

bump

[TheForeigner]

It's both sides, really. I think it's not prudery though. Modern western society is oversexualized and vulgar. But you being gay, can't understand that some people might be sick of the commercialization of sex.

[Tooting Carmen]

bump

[Teutone]

prudery?

We live in complete hedonism.

Consindering gays running naked in gay parades wrong, is already prudery.

[Tooting Carmen]

bump

[Sikeliot]

Feminism is advocating for promiscuity and "sexual liberation" not prudishness.