Does modern-day prudery derive more from feminism or social/religious conservatism?

[Tooting Carmen]

Feminism is advocating for promiscuity and "sexual liberation" not prudishness.

Maybe it was in the 70s, but not now. Instead, it is all "metoo" and thinking that a man who touches a woman's knee is no different to a wholesale rapist. Even Germaine Greer herself has modified her once libertarian views by some distance.

[Sikeliot]

Maybe it was in the 70s, but not now. Instead, it is all "metoo" and thinking that a man who touches a woman's knee is no different to a wholesale rapist. Even Germaine Greer herself has modified her once libertarian views by some distance.

It's not the same, but it's there. The idea now is women should flaunt it for the world to see and be as promiscuous as possible on their own terms, but men cannot look or touch, not that women have to be prudes. The idea is women do not have to show restraint but men do.

[Incal]

Neither. It's a complot to weaken and manipulate humanity. Both feminism and religions are just tools used by those who hide in the shadows.

[Tooting Carmen]

bump

[coolfrenchguy]

It's not the same, but it's there. The idea now is women should flaunt it for the world to see and be as promiscuous as possible on their own terms, but men cannot look or touch, not that women have to be prudes. The idea is women do not have to show restraint but men do.

my position is special because for me religions create frustrated people understand i'am not sexually conservative with my unique monoamory but i'am completly opposed in all form of promiscuity i don't cheat her and she don't cheat me,is a trust contract,we are one and we don't need more,when i says not sexually conservative i means it's framed at the beginning we are on same the page and we are the greatest fuckers,but we can talk of different POV,many people have a complete lack of psychology and of knowledge beyond the sexual act himself ,i have explain here in other threads my approach related to the love feeling and the sexuality since a few weeks i read all the bullshit(not here) as possible everything and his opposite,pre-concieved ideas,cliché, pre-marketized,pre-panalized and of course in this big mess you have valuable intels but you need to filter and not to take everything as bible word,i'am for picking elements of both universe i mean feminism conduct to gender equality and is positive, for example for the women salaries
from the social/religious conservatism you are loyal,faithfull,i am for a tabula rasa of patriarca and matriarca view because from them come so much troubles in this world,here is my anarchy side speaking : no one is deciding to my place of what i need to think or to act,so fuck off feminazis swj and frustrated roman and orthodox christians they are the two side of a same coin.
i prefer by far evangelists,protestants,where sex i natural and not filthy,because the main problem is the archaic view that have roman and orthodox churches so fucking conservative,but i like pope françois he's more open he says "who i am for judging" is a big progressive step.
imagine the conflict that have a gay christian between his own sexuality and his faith
you'll see is total clash of values and futher of civilisation between the past, the "heritage", and the present, the main problem is to find an equilibrate point,nowadays everything is desequilibrate is very sad, i like to consider myself very binary but with an evaluation of the socioliogic angles,in general with me is all or nothing and i don't like people in the grey area,choose your side but with understanding ,even i'am mad about what the youth became,i'am not a saint i have my past but i have always put me some boundaries,because without clear structures the society failed,sorry if i'am more on a self phylosophical disgression,but many people haven't retained the lessons from the past.so modern day prudery is the fruit of the religious side, in the sens that leftie feminazis wants in their dreams "a new religion":dumb mulattos,white cuckolds etc..,promoting the sickiest way of thinking that i have ever seen and them on the top of the food chain with the help of manginas,UN, they want the opposite
the big kumbaya reversed nazism,as i have might understand.without me because i'am not a submissive freudian faggot.

[Phenix]

Religious teachings are dead, the market won, and people hadn't enough time to create newer social regulations in order to control the market, so they are doing it elephantine passing by some awkward moralist gymnastics.

Maybe it was in the 70s, but not now. Instead, it is all "metoo" and thinking that a man who touches a woman's knee is no different to a wholesale rapist. Even Germaine Greer herself has modified her once libertarian views by some distance.

What you describe is a double capitalization of female attribute and mental castration of men, nothing prude here.

[coolfrenchguy]

Religious teachings are dead, the market won, and people hadn't enough time to create newer social regulations in order to control the market, so they are doing it elephantine passing by some awkward moralist gymnastics.



What you describe is a double capitalization of female attribute and mental castration of men, nothing prude here.

yes but they haven't really won
n yet in all the layers of the society, i believe that you can find counter-counter people

[Phenix]

yes but they haven't really won
n yet in all the layers of the society, i believe that you can find counter-counter people

Of course you'll find some counter-powers and disconnected individuals, but seeing the problem rationally with no attachment, globalists won, it's too late to change the course of future, only thing possible is to sabotage their work and force the system to drop under the weight of its own contradictions (like the pseudo-prude feminist thing), after that it's for other generations to do their part of the job, previous ones didn't.

[Peterski]

Of course you'll find some counter-powers and disconnected individuals, but seeing the problem rationally with no attachment, globalists won, it's too late to change the course of future, only thing possible is to sabotage their work and force the system to drop under the weight of its own contradictions (like the pseudo-prude feminist thing), after that it's for other generations to do their part of the job, previous ones didn't.

It is not something unique in history, it has happened before but not on a global scale, simply because there was no global civilization in the past. But for example developments in the Roman Empire were very similar to present-day developments.

[Phenix]

It is not something unique in history, it has happened before but not on a global scale, simply because there was no global civilization in the past. But for example developments in the Roman Empire were very similar to present-day developments.

If that is comparable although it is not, then whom will take the role of foreign invader in global failure and premise of world war situation? the incompetence of previous generations masses and malignant work of some elites lead us here, now we can only hope an internal dynamite posing, no exterior help is possible.