2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,171 Given: 7,123 |
All around me are familiar faces, worn out places, worn out faces
Bright and early for the daily races, going nowhere, going nowhere
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Data for Latin America is incorrect in some cases. I guess it is based on self-identification.
Chile for example should be in the same category as Mexico, it is mostly a Mestizo nation.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,495 Given: 884 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,157 Given: 6,705 |
Pretty accurate for Australia and New Zealand. The Northern Territory in Australia has the most Aborigines hence its colour on the map. Likewise the Mauris in NZ mean it too is not a higher %.
Although 92% for Australia seems a bit high, given than Asians make up about 15-20% of the population.
Last edited by Crn Volk; 05-10-2018 at 11:21 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,222 Given: 524 |
I live in Florida USA and notice that it is fairly white considering we have a fairly sizeable "Hispanic" population. Not sure what this map is based on; census reports in the US?
Punt DNAL K15 Single Pop Sharing Tuscan 2.07
Mixed Mode Pop Sharing: 65.1% Tuscan+34.9% Greek_Thessaly @ 1.41
Eurogenes K 13 Single Pop Sharing Greek Thessaly 3.72
Mixed Mode Pop Sharing 69.5% South_Italian+30.5% Hungarian @ 2.56
MDLP K 16 Single Pop Sharing Greek (Greece) 3.62
Mixed Mode Pop Sharing: 58.3% Greek (Macedonia)+41.7% Italian (Bergamo)@ 2.5
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,156 Given: 2,162 |
Not sure where you got the numbers, but i'll make some points:
White is not defined. Different standards around the world. Compare US/Canada whites vs Latin American whites for ancestry.
For US the percentage seems high, or using census data... probably "white Hispanics", "mena" are included...
For Brazil a complete different standard is used hence the high number.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,463 Given: 12,450 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,337 Given: 3,930 |
It is not an accurate map.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks