Islam and The Mark of The Beast

[Dandelion]

Actually, in my college, in the restroom hangs a notice saying 'washing of your hands mandatory: after visiting the toilet and before eating' and a list of steps one has to take to properly wash your hands. Very curious... Reminds me of this:



But it's not down to me that that notice was deemed necessary to get placed there.

[Al-Meksiki]

Germans and Scandinavians are clean, though. Well, back in the day the Pagan Vikings were described as hygienic by the Arabs. So it all makes sense.

What's wrong with the Dutch, though? If the statistic is correct.

Also, speaking about Islam. Among the dirtiest people I've seen were muslim immigrants. With yellow teeth and scabies on their hands. Poverty you might say,... still worth noting. Cutting off your foreskin doesn't make one hygienic immediately and it's absurd to need a real through coercion of God's Wrath for something evident as washing one's hands.

Reminds me of a muslim (Iraqi) I used to do a project with. We also ate at the same table and he told me 'let's wash our hands first', as if I wasn't planning on doing so. He thought he was teaching me the virtue of his religion on something I deem self-evident. lol.

It's poverty. Back in the Guatemala the natives were filthy, in the US it was the poor whites, blacks and latinos, in France its the Arabs. I make a habit to publicly shame people into hygiene. You'd be surprised how many people think washing their hands is optional, especially men. I know a few who justified urinating and not washing their hands by saying that their "dick is clean". It's why I refuse to shake anyones hand anymore.

[Al-Meksiki]

It doesn't matter what you call all these signs... kinda irrelevant...

No it's pretty relevant, because if you make an assertion like "crossed scimitars are commonly used to decorate calligraphic basmalas" and your evidence is wrong, it kind of kills your argument and makes you look like you dont have any real evidence.

[Kamal900]

Actually, Muslims believe the anti-Christ would be a person..a Jewish person at that, and that he would rule the world from Israel till Jesus, the true Messiah, would come to earth from heaven and slay him alongside with the Jews.

[Loki]

No it's pretty relevant, because if you make an assertion like "crossed scimitars are commonly used to decorate calligraphic basmalas" and your evidence is wrong, it kind of kills your argument and makes you look like you dont have any real evidence.

No, it's not relevant. It doesn't kill the argument at all. You're talking nonsense. It is what it looks like, anyone can see that. You're just throwing in ideas to muddy the waters... enough with the taqqiya. If you're saying that "isn't any real evidence" you must be blind... blinded by Allah/Satan, yes.

[Loki]

Actually, Muslims believe the anti-Christ would be a person..a Jewish person at that, and that he would rule the world from Israel till Jesus, the true Messiah, would come to earth from heaven and slay him alongside with the Jews.

What Muslims believe is irrelevant.

[happycow]

Doesn't the bible warn of a false prophet? I always assumed it was mohammed.

[Loki]

Doesn't the bible warn of a false prophet? I always assumed it was mohammed.

Yes, it must be him... and it's especially significant that the false prophet is mentioned alongside the story of this "mark of the beast".

When Jesus comes, he will have the beast and the false prophet thrown into the lake of fire (hell -- the second death).

[Dibran]

What Muslims believe is irrelevant.

What you believe is also irrelevant. Organized religion and institutionalization is for sheep. Like yourself.

[Loki]

What you believe is also irrelevant. Organized religion and institutionalization is for sheep. Like yourself.

No, you are wrong. I'm no sheep, and I don't follow organized religion. I follow God's word and his Son.