Originally Posted by
ButlerKing
Unless you have facts to prove it up otherwise it's your own superficial as fuck opinion.
I could easily say they look like that due to R1b or they already have R1b ( don't know if R1b is indegenious or European colonist )
Or hell one say they look like that maybe due to from mtDNA X aswell ( west Eurasian in Natives ) which is 3% to 25% in Native Americans depending on the tribe. Who's to say your Native American Caucasoid faces isn't from that ????? How do you know if it's a R1b man, a Native American with recent colonial ancestry or maybe he is indeed a male with mtDNA X ????
Haplogroup X is found in approximately 7% of native Europeans,[3] and 3% of all Native Americans from North America.[4] But it can range from 3% to 25% so even on the mtDNA side of Native Americans is significant enough let alone R1b. No evidence is due to haplogroup Q.
" Although it occurs only at a frequency of about 3% for the total current indigenous population of the Americas, it is a bigger haplogroup in northern North America, where among the Algonquian peoples it comprises up to 25% of mtDNA X types.[13][14] It is also present in lesser percentages to the west and south of this area—among the Sioux (15%), the Nuu-chah-nulth (11%–13%), the Navajo (7%), and the Yakama (5%).[15]"
Bookmarks