Anglosphere vs Latin America?

[renaissance12]

Because North America weather is not so bad as South america weather...

[lisarb]

Historically much less political corruption with the former British colonies, USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

Guyana is a British colony: very poor

[KMack]

Guyana is a British colony: very poor

Berkan did not mention them. Hong Kong could be added to former British colony. A lot of wealth there, expensive city.

[lisarb]

Berkan did not mention them. Hong Kong could be added to former British colony. A lot of wealth there, expensive city.

Guyana is the poorest country in South America

[Dragoon]

For this post: The term refers to the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.
(Excludes: South Asia, and African countries)

-Some of the countries like USA and Canada were closer to Europe compared to Argentina or Brazil.
-The US was the first country in the Americas (?). They had the highest population.
-For many decades USA/Canada had large majorities of Europeans, less mixing.
-By the late 1800s the US was already the highest economy in West (China and India were higher).
-Elite Protestant and Jewish groups practices allowed them to become very wealthy.
-Would say America/Canada had higher IQ.
-More organization, numbers, better tech (progressive), connections to top banking families.

In 1900ad Population of Americas:
USA: 76 million
Brazil: 18 million
Mexico: 14 million
Canada: 5 million
Argentina: 5 million
Colombia: 4 million
Chile: 3 million
Peru: 3 million
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...lation_in_1900

Australia/NZ were further but still managed to do okay. Cant comment on them.

[lisarb]

For this post: The term refers to the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.
(Excludes: South Asia, and African countries)

-Some of the countries like USA and Canada were closer to Europe compared to Argentina or Brazil.
-The US was the first country in the Americas (?). They had the highest population.
-For many decades USA/Canada had large majorities of Europeans, less mixing.
-By 1870-1900 the US was already the highest economy in West.
-Elite Protestant and Jewish groups practices allowed them to become very wealthy.
-Would say America/Canada had higher IQ.
-More organization, numbers, better tech (progressive), connections to top banking families.

In 1900ad Population of Americas:
USA: 76 million
Brazil: 18 million
Mexico: 14 million
Canada: 5 million
Argentina: 5 million
Colombia: 4 million
Chile: 3 million
Peru: 3 million
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...lation_in_1900

Australia/NZ were further but still managed to do okay. Cant comment on them.

lol guyana,jamaica,trinidad and tobago and belize rich and developed british colonies

[KMack]

Guyana is the poorest country in South America

Guessing British subjects did not move there in any real numbers, same for other Euros.
It isn't an Anglo country. Indo and Afro Guyanese are 75% of the population, then the rest are various Natives.

[KMack]

lol guyana,jamaica,trinidad and tobago and belize rich and developed british colonies

They are not Anglo countries. The colonies where British subjects moved to and other Euros they became First World.

[Papastratosels26]

America>All.

[Heather Duval]

There is no Iberian colony that is more successful than USA/Australia. And the US has more blacks than Mexico.
But everyone knows that Latin America was not a colony of settlement
They stole diamonds/golds and yet they are one of the worst countries in Europe. With so much that they stole could be today world-wide power.