Many blonds and blue eyed men are a bit swarthy

[Bloody]

One exemple, François Hollande is lighter skinned than Emmanuel Macron.

None of them is blonde, Hollande has black hair and Macron has brown hair.

[Zroota]

What is the difference between Indo European and Proto Indo European?

Their haplogroups I think. Some were R1a and others R1b.

[Tauromachos]

There are different types of blond and blue eyed people.

One type common among Scandinavians,Anglos and Germanics is blond and blue eyed but can tan fairly well

A second type is indeed with very pale skin and doesn't tan at all and is very sensitive to UV light.

This type is common among English people but also Northern Slavic groups

[Septentrion]

According to my observations, lightest skinned peoples are dark haired.

The whitest-skinned people have red or reddish hair. There are many blond-hair Scandinavians with a pretty fair skin too, remember that.

[Septentrion]

Yes but the majority of irish people are brown haired.

Hold on! Yes, the majority of Irish people have brown hair, but a very high proportion of them are carriers of the red hair gene which is a recessive trait hidden under the brown hair of these Celtic people. It is this red hair gene which expresses itself in the very white skin which cannot tan/ tans with difficulty and freckles that the Irish people are known for. Most Irish males even when brown-haired have reddish-tint in their beard according a study. Other Celtic people such as the Scottish, Welsh exhibit such phenotypes. The IRF4 gene which specializes in the combination of brown hair, a sun-sensitive skin, freckles, pure blue eyes is highest among the Irish too. Your statement is only right when it applies to Celtic/those with strong Celtic admixture people or else Scandinavians and other blond-haired Northern Europeans are as whole generally lighter-skinned and tan less than the rest.

[Septentrion]

Hum, i have just read a little about theses peoples, and Baltids don't have a "translucent" skin...

They don't, but they can be fair.

[Septentrion]

Irish people arent majority redhaired..the vast majority of Irish have dark hair.

According to my observations, lightest skinned peoples are dark haired.

If the darkest-haired were the lightest-skinned, then the following nations, Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal, Albania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Serbia and Romania should have the highest ratio of truly white skin which doesn't even tan! The darkest-haired nations are also the swarthiest in Europe.

[Septentrion]

Dark-Brown to Medium-Brown haired I say. True black hair isnt rare among them either.

Enough of the bloody lies, Bloody!!! Truly black is exceedingly rare among the Irish, less than 3% of the Irish total at 2.7%! Therefore pure black hair is negligible thus is group under the dark brown class. The vast majority of dark hair in Ireland and Britain is dark brown not black. The same applies in the Low Countries and a good part of Northern and Eastern France. Yes, most Irish have brown hair (67%), but many are blond or red-haired. Dark brown hair (36%) seem to be slightly the most common color, followed closely by light brown (31%), then blond (23%) and red (10%). Now if we are talking about reddish hair ( whether reddish-brown or reddish blond) depending on the definition varies then from 10% to 30%, which the world's maximum for rufous hair. According to the Irish Skin Foundation in a census released in the summer of the year (2018!!) 93% of the Irish are of skin type I and II. No other European nation can rival that, making them the fairest-skinned people on earth. This goes contrary to the lies, you have spread for a while.

[AngloJewess]

It may be that ash-blonds in which rufosity is absent tan better than golden blonds.

Irish blonds are 95%+ of the Golden variety. Thus the vast majority of Irish blonds can be said to be rufous.

Irish blonds belong almost uniformly to Fitzpatrick skin types I & II, so they do not have significant tanning ability.

On the otherhand in countries like Poland and Sweden and perhaps even more so the Baltic States most blonds are of the ashen variety and are in no way transitive to red hair.

Blonds from such countries around the Baltic Sea tan adequately as a rule, while with Irish blonds it is the opposite case.

We don’t even have to use such a drastic comparison.
Norwegian, Dutch, and Danish people tend have more Golden blondism rather than ash blondism and these peoples generally burn easier than groups from around the Baltic.

Tanning ability follows a Northwest-Southeast axis rather than a north-south axis and that explains why tanning ability among Northeastern Europeans is generally greater than more Northwestern Europeans.

Golden blond hair is closely correlated with MC1R mutations. There are high MC1R, yet relativly brunet counties such as Wales and Ireland (as I have already touched upon) where almost all of the blonds are rufous or Golden and have more of such hair then some drastically blonder countries such as Lithuania.

With all this I think you should reconsider that Brunets are fairer skinned than blonds because rufosity has much more of stronger impact on skin lightness than Hair lightness does. More than anything else you should know there is no evidence of brunets being lighter skinned than blonds in any given ethnic population.

[Regnera]

Because they're tanned,and redheads and some dark-haired people are difficult to get tanned